User talk:DraxusD

Cuthbert Blanedale Frunk

Yeah, I know. I was trying to move Cuthbert Frunk W. Bloodpaw to that name, but I didn't know that the page had to be blank beforehand. My bad. I'll just change around the other links instead, hopefully that page will get deleted before anyone sees it.

Not a problem, I'm sure it will. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia so I can sympathize :) Happy editing.

Revert Thanks

...my talk page has been getting hit quite frequently recently - happy patrolling. Dust Filter 17:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my page! ---Signed By KoЯnfan71 (User Page—My Talk) 20:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me too --Oxymoron⁸³ 06:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I could help. DraxusD 18:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metroneck

Saw your CSD. You have to admit it was a little funny. :-) Jddphd 04:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, maybe a little DraxusD 04:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging

Woah, I wasn't done, I created the article not 2-minutes before you tagged it.--Cronholm¹⁴⁴ 11:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Acadia University Page

Hi, the change I made to the Acadia University page was not vandalism. I did describe them when I made them, as can be seen in the history page. The "Currently" section at the bottom refers to a faculty strike which ended this week. It would appear to have no further relevance since it was about a "current" event. Since there is no section on strikes, it makes sense to simply erase this information. In 179 years (since Horton Academy was founded in 1828), this three week strike is 0.032% of Acadia's history and hardly something of significant future impact warranting 1/6 of the sections. Thank you. Adteps 03:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage question

Hello again! I can still see the comment that I left on your talkpage when I had first started here, but so much has happened since then! Anyway, I noticed that on your userpage, you have a link to your contributions, but it links to User:Tokek's contribs, not yours. Was that done on purpose? I've got your page on watchlist, so you can reply here or on mine, I'll see it. Thanks! GlassCobra 04:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for pointing that out! I'm not sure how that happened... weird. I took a bit of a hiatus from Wikipedia for a little but so my talk page hasn't seen any action. Thanks again for the warning, and happy editing :) DraxusD 04:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Diana_Fortuna.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Diana_Fortuna.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Citizens Budget Commission for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Citizens Budget Commission is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens Budget Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 04:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]