User talk:Dsulce

This is Dsulce's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Someone deleted my school assignment. It is due in 2 hours can someone please help me get it back.

Another editor has posted a message about this, saying "This user was able to get the information needed from the deleted page." I don't know exactly what that means, but it seems to suggest that you have got away with using Wikipedia as a web host to store content for use unrelated to contributing to the encyclopaedia. If so, you are lucky, but please don't do it again. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greenworks Lawn Mower (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A weakly-sourced product-placing advert for a non-notable company. Language/content is completely promotional. The author has at least tried to declare a Conflict of interest. Tagging for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greenworks Lawn Mower and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Greenworks Lawn Mower, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dsulce! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked, and add a heading. The editor who nominated it for deletion said A weakly-sourced product-placing advert for a non-notable company. Language/content is completely promotional. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Your references, other than those giving general background were not independent third-party sources but press releases, personal opinions and reviews. Note that references should not show bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits, not promotional text

it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: celebrates... not only creates top notch electric mowers but also specializes in creating other Cordless outdoor equipment. The company was founded on the important's [sic] of creating products that are innovative and are sustainable all while being a friend to our environment... This mower would be good for a home... some serious cutting power that can rival even gas mowers...— and so on, it's a sales pitch
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when it's a spamlink to the company's site.
When people write promos for a company, I normally ask if they have a conflict of interest, but since you say it's for homework I assume that's not the case.

Wikipedia is a serious on-line encyclopaedia, not a free homework resource, and I'm not prepared to restore such promotional text. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article and promotion. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]