User talk:Dublin8david

Welcome!

Hello, Dublin8david, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 17:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Michael Healy (artist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Michael Healy (artist), Dublin8david!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the article. You can improve and streamlining your citations by using appropriate citation templates, e.g. {{cite book}} or {{cite journal}}. Extraneous text like "an article in" is unnecessary. See WP:CITEHOW for more info.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert McGoldrick moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hubert McGoldrick, does not have any sources and citations as written to remain published in the article mainspace. I've verified and there are enough reliable sources to cite. To avoid a possible WP:BLPPROD I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop it as you did with Michael Healy (artist). When you're done, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. If you need help, let me know and I'll take a look. Robert G. (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (National Irish Visual Arts Library) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating National Irish Visual Arts Library, Dublin8david!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories at Hubert McGoldrick

Hi. I added some categories to your Hubert McGoldrick article. Please add more if you can. If not, just remove the tag of articles needing more categories (at the bottom of the article near references). --Gprscrippers (talk) 17:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dublin8david. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Distillers Press (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Distillers Press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Distillers Press, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dublin8david, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SeraphWiki (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Distillers Press (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The notability of this subject is still not clear here. Suggest including this subject as a section within the parent National College of Art and Design article. Much copyediting is still needed here though, it still has a very promotional, non-encyclopedic tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Distillers Press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Distillers Press, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sligo article and stained glass mention

Hello Dublin8david, I just want to let you know that I removed your addition regarding a stained glass window at Holy Cross Priory from the Sligo article. Firstly, the addition didn't seem suitable in the context of the History section as there is otherwise no mention of the Dominican church (known as Holy Cross Priory, or locally "the friary") in the article. Secondly, the church was substantially rebuilt in the 1970s and it's unclear to me if that window survived the reconstruction. Finally, regarding citations, sources such as unpublished academic theses may not be suitable in general as they are not independently verifiable. You may wish to review WP:SOURCES for further details on sources and verifiability. I hope you won't be discouraged as I see you've been creating some useful articles, as for the artists themselves. Thanks Declangi (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Declangi, sorry that you removed my addition to the Sligo article but thank you for taking the time to provide the reasons. I would, respectively, like to make a few points. Firstly, at the time I thought the 'History' section was the most suitable, though perhaps not ideal location to add the additional piece of information about this stained glass window from 1911 by Michael Healy. As I'm sure you realise, when one just wants to add a short item of additional information it can be difficult to determine where best it might fit when it would not merit a completely new section devoted to it. Secondly, I know there was no mention of the Holy Cross Priory already in the article on Sligo but sometimes it may be the case that a building might not be of much significance but there may be an artifact/work of art in it that is. (The artist who designed and made this window, Michael Healy, may not be as well known as the other three stained glass artists with whom he is often grouped (Harry Clarke, Wilhelmina Geddes and Evie Hone) but there are five windows by him on permanent display in the new room dedicated to Irish stained glass in the National Gallery). Thirdly, you were wondering if the window survived the reconstruction of the 1970s of the Dominican Priory and I'm happy to report it was removed from its previous location and reinstalled in a specially built new aperture in the church. Fourthly, I take your point about unpublished academic theses but I thought I had also included a published one: Gazetteer of Irish Stained Glass (Irish Academic Press, 1988); if I didn't, that was an oversight on my part. Thank you for your compliment that I have been creating some useful articles on Irish artists. It an area of interest of mine, Irish stained glass specifically, and I'm eager, where appropriate, to bring works by the these artists to the notice of local communities. I am relatively new to contributing to Wikipedia so still finding my way. Regards, David Dublin8david (talk) 11:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Dublin8david

User:Dublin8david, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dublin8david and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dublin8david during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. The Banner talk 23:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dublin8david. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dublin8david. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]