User talk:E8QLx4L

This is E8QLx4L's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Prager (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Submission lacks references that are independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Prager and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laura Prager, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, E8QLx4L! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 02:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Recycling in Israel

The article Recycling in Israel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTSTATS, this article is just a list of stats and regulations with no assertion of WP:NOTABILITY or any description of how recycling in Israel can be compared to any other country.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A different editor recommended closing this proposal and starting a different deletion procedure, which is the topic of the notice below. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Recycling in Israel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recycling in Israel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recycling in Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:A/I/PIA

Hi,

Please read WP:A/I/PIA: any editor with less than 500 edits are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. That means you, and edits like you di to as-Samu. Please respect the rules, or you might get blocked, Huldra (talk) 22:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about as-Samu, not the the Arab-Israeli conflict. I improved the writing quality in a small section and added a citation. E8QLx4L (E8QLx4L) 17:30, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the link to Samu incident: if you think that isn't about the Arab-Israeli conflict, then think again. If you do that again I will report you, Huldra (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huldra, I moved the Samu incident link into the paragraph.E8QLx4L (talk) 2:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

....thereby making it much less visible. And you changed Jordanian rule to "Jordanian occupation", piping it to Jordanian annexation of the West Bank. If you think that isn't related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, then please think again, Huldra (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Huldra (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yedioth Ahronoth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Date formatting

Hello E8QLx4L. Could you stop changing the date format in references from day month year to month day, year (as you did e.g. here) – this goes against MOS:DATEVAR. Thanks, Number 5 7 18:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I see you are continuing to change dates (e.g. here). Please could you stop doing this. Thanks Number 5 7 10:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when adding new dates (e.g. here), please do it in the same format as the existing ones. Cheers, Number 5 7 11:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]