User talk:Elttaruuu/2023/June

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oompa (rapper) has been accepted

Oompa (rapper), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Giving warnings before reporting to AIV

Please warn users before reporting them to WP:AIV, as said in the 3rd point of the "Important! Please remember the following:" section, even if the article they vandalised is an article you created. Given the comments you made at User talk:FeanorStar7, are you using an extensions, such as RedWarn? If you are, the same rules apply, and, if anything, be more careful, given that extensions like RedWarn let you report users to AIV in a few clicks. Thanks, Sneezless (talk) (contribs) 16:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the multiple edits, just realised how patronising this sounded afterwards. Anyway, I can understand being annoyed that someone vandalised an article you submitted through Articles for creation, but the rules about warnings are consistent across the site, with the exception of intense vandalism, where an immediate final warning can be used. Since I'm bad at explanations, I'd suggest you look through this page, which lists user notices, including warning. I'd appreciate it if you kept Wikipedia's warning policies in mind in future. Once again, thanks, Sneezless (talk) (contribs) 16:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sneezless. Thanks! I have never dealt with vandalism up until this point and was unsure of if IP pages counted as users. If they do, I will definitely keep this in mind. Elttaruuu (talk) 17:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janae Johnson has been accepted

Janae Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Janae Johnson

Hello, Elttaruuu,

Thank you for creating Janae Johnson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! The text of this page need some copy editing for professional writing style, but otherwise this looks good!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Taking Out The Trash}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaylors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaylors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaylors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Peterpie123rww (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Confirmed to BARSHweedle, used to vote-stack at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaylors.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Passion made me stupid this round. Thanks for holding Wikipedians accountable Elttaruuu (talk) 20:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

"Stupid this round"? You've had that account since 31 May, well before the Gaylors deletion discussion was started. What were you going to use it for? Nythar (💬-🍀) 20:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

honestly just the citation bot for my articles. I need to not use my wikipedia powers for anything Taylor Swift cuz then I become an idiot but everything else is fairly constructive and helpful from me pretty sure Elttaruuu (talk) 20:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Just wanted to highlight a cool community and did the wrong thing when I felt people didn't react well to that Elttaruuu (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

I will do my best to chill out and follow the guidelines which are there to keep things fair Elttaruuu (talk) 20:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wacky Kastle

Hello, Elttaruuu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wacky Kastle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276 Online events: New: Women in Red's 8th anniversary | Alphabet run A & B | Sports Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Look out for contributors interested in writing about women and invite them to join Women in Red Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding Category:Taylor Swift to apparently inappropriate articles. Meters (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Each of those topics were significantly linked to Swift but okay Elttaruuu (talk) 04:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Really? I think you need to follow your own advice [1]: I need to not use my wikipedia powers for anything Taylor Swift cuz then I become an idiot Meters (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Super civil and kind of you, thanks for that Elttaruuu (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I don’t have to be perfect at editing to contribute to Wikipedia.

also why wouldn’t Jack Antonoff have a Taylor Swift category when he’s produced ten years worth of her music? Elttaruuu (talk) 04:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Maybe that one's OK, but 9 days after posting your comment about needing to stay away from Taylor Swift you spammed almost 40 articles into Category:Taylor Swift. There's no need to add that cat to every article that mentions her name, and some of those articles have no apparent connection, such as Friendship bracelet and Easter egg (media). Meters (talk) 05:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm inclined to be much more sparing with the category additions. For example, Sony Music Publishing represents hundreds of notable artists, and we shouldn't put the label into every client's category. Categories are for the defining characteristics of an article's topic, and Swift doesn't define the label. Certes (talk) 08:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm in complete agreement. I was concerned that I was getting too aggressive in cutting. Meters (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)