User talk:Empereur42

Welcome!

Hello, Empereur42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome. Jac16888 ^Talk 22:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in 2000. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1999. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2000. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2000s (decade) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] of the [[Gregorian calendar]] that began on January 1, 2001 and ended on December 31, 2009 (because 2000 is a 20st century year and it is the part of the 1990s decade.
50factsaboutTheQueensGoldenJubilee.aspx| last=The Royal Household| title=Her Majesty The Queen > Jubilees and other milestones > Golden Jubilee > 50 facts about The Queen's Golden Jubilee| publisher=Queen's Printer| accessdate=November 25, 2009|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]