User talk:Ericeee10

Please stop adding stuff to other articles!

License tagging for File:King Boo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:King Boo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Santa Claus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ericeee10! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 699 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tom King (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 20:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kent Osborne

The article Kent Osborne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Santa Claus, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ➜Gƒoley Four (GSV) 01:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to SpongeBob SquarePants appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Philip Trueman (talk) 23:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Based on this edit, I have blocked you indefinitely. It is possible your account was compromised, but if not, that edit is grounds for an immediate indefinite block either way. Acalamari 15:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]