Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:David Horowitz. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 21:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Excel mac 2011 icon.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Excel mac 2011 icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:ConfederateLincoln.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SkinGun™ illustration.png
Thanks for uploading File:SkinGun™ illustration.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
...was unneeded, biased, and opinionated. Do not add even single words that imply Wikipedia as a whole has an opinion on any matter, no matter how "repugnant" you think it is.
Seriously, don't do that shit again.
- please see my reply on your talk page on the tone of your message, particularly your use of foul language. Please moderate your moderation. erielhonan 23:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)