User talk:Ethan Mitchell

Welcome!

Hello, Ethan Mitchell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:59, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ostension[edit]

Hello! Thank you for contributing the article about Ostension to WP. I found Ostensive definition when I categorised your page and I think that the two should be merged as they are pretty similar in terms of scope and content. I would make researching the term easier for a user. I have tagged your article to this effect. What do you think? Regards, (aeropagitica) 23:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus decision-making rewrite coming soon[edit]

howdy . you're getting this message because you have made a meaningful contribution to Consensus decision-making in the last couple of months. This note is to inform you that i have done a complete rewrite of the article, basically from the ground up, and will be installing the rewrite sometime after 22:00 mst (gmt -7)

i decided to undertake this rewrite because the current article had some notable shortcomings in my opinion, most notably:

lack of references: whole sections of the current article are unreferenced
section balance: the amount of detail on some sections was out of step with the detail level on other sections. for instance 'timing' is as large as 'key principles'
run-on writing: some sections succumb to rambling, while other sections are quite concise to the point of being terse.

all of these problems are inevitable in a project written by a group of people with different areas of expertise and writing styles.

my rewrite is designed to address these issues. most notably i have aimed to make the article more concise -- put more content in less words as it were -- and to make sure that everything is effectively sourced. i have also pretty much completely re-sectioned the article in an attempt to flow from general down to specific.

i have given this notice to you as a 'heads up' that this change is coming. i realize that you have invested a lot of effort into the existing article and i want to make sure that you are ready to make the edits you feel are necessary once my rewrite goes 'live'.

i also intend to submit the new article for peer review shortly after posting it. i think that the feedback will help us all drive this piece forward, hopefully to at least ga status! -- frymaster 23:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus decision-making quaker subsection[edit]

right, i've taken a stab at retooling the quaker model section of the article and am keen for any input. i am striving to keep the sections short, so one thing that may be considered in the future would be a seperate article on quaker consensus (although, i'm probably not the guy to write that one). -- frymaster 01:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Homeschooling and making friends[edit]

You're right in that there are no homeschoolers in Spain: I was so surprised when finding about the topic because here kids are enforced by law to attend school until 16. This way the general culture of the population is ensured and child labor is avoided. Parents who fail to send their children to school are punished by law.

Why are homeschooled children suposed to have more free time than schooled ones? Are they cleverer than average, or their parents choose to not teach them subjects they don't like/grasp? Is the difference between teaching 1 child versus 30 children so considerable (I wouldn't think so)?

My concern with friends is not if the children are able to develop long-term friendships out of school. I'm not worried about their future but about their day after day. Disregarding school friends because their friendship vanishes in the end is like not giving your kids any toy because when they grow up they won't play with them any more. The picture of a kid without friends with which to play hide-and-seek makes me feel quite sad. I know homeschooled children aren't crying all day or something, but it's because we all believe that we have a sufficient number of friends, sufficient money, etc. But more friends, more money, more free time, etc, is always good. Don't you think so? --euyyn 15:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aria.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aria.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Reversions and page histories[edit]

Hi, please see Wikipedia:Oversight. utcursch | talk 02:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admins can delete particular revisions of the page -- the log can be seen by others, and the deleted revisions can be seen by other admins. The oversight team can remove these versions permanently -- they won't be visible to anybody.

In case of Serge Schmemann, I deleted a few revisions that contained some personal/defamatory information (log), and asked Schmemann to contact the oversight team, if he wanted the revisions to be deleted permanently. utcursch | talk 03:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Dollhouse (TV series), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Reverted your edit in error. Please disregard my last message. I have undone my revert. I apologize for the confusion. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aria.JPG[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Aria.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 11:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Pvalue.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Pvalue.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (countercurrent multiplier)[edit]

Mechanism describing a mechanism... It seems I was affected by my former physics teacher from 35 years ago (I just met him in Jerusalem). Each lesson started (in Hebrew) with: We have a system within a system, which uses the following equation... פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]