User talk:EthicsGradient

Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, EthicsGradient! Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: PrimeBOT (talk) 21:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC). Best of luck, EthicsGradient, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 19:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-referencing Argument from Love

Hi EthicsGradient. In your deletion vote on Argument from Love you wrote "delete unless re-referenced and re-written". I've added several more refs and amended it a bit. Is this enough for you to keep the article (not of course a question of whether you agree with it)? I'm happy to add more refs and material if that would change your vote. NBeale 12:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NBeale. I had another look on the page. The problem is that while there are lot of references to links between the perception of love and the existence of God in theological literature, the article presents something like a formal proof. Unless there is a source that actually spells out The Argument from Love in a formal manner, presenting it like this would be original research. --EthicsGradient 13:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of ant genera

Hello. You removed the genus Acanthognathus from List of ant genera (alphabetical). Well, I don´t know if Acanthognathus is also a bony, extinct fish, but really is a ant genera too. I'm a editor from Spanish Wikipedia, and I don't know how resolve this here, then I comment it to you because maybe you can/want resolve it. Greetings, --Furado (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ups! Maybe a vandalism? The article say:

Acanthognathus is an extinct genus of bony fish. It was first named by Mayr in 1887, and contains six species, A. brevicornis, A. lentus, A. ocellatus, A. rudis, A. stipulosus, A. teledectus.

and the references are www.discoverlife.org. Well, the information are correct but about a genera of ant, and the taxobox seems it's false. I'll write about it in WikiProject Fishes. Greetings, --Furado (talk) 23:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Case solved. Sorry if I disturbed. Greetings,--Furado (talk) 12:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Human N-acetyl Transferase 2PQT.png

Thanks for uploading File:Human N-acetyl Transferase 2PQT.png. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]