User talk:Eugene m1999

This is Eugene m1999's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yevgeniy Malyarchuk (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yevgeniy Malyarchuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yevgeniy Malyarchuk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eugene m1999! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yevgeniy Malyarchuk (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nerd1a4i was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yevgeniy Malyarchuk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yevgeniy Malyarchuk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nerd1a4i (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yevgeniy Malyarchuk

Hello Eugene m1999,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yevgeniy Malyarchuk for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yevgeniy Malyarchuk

Hello Eugene m1999,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yevgeniy Malyarchuk for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugene m1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account should be ublocked because it was in the first place the article that was created by me was speedily deleted without any warning and it should be restored as well because I was writing of an upcoming eurovision celebrity who is popular in the Eurovision comunity, I have understood that some words should have been changed to sound not promoting in any way but rather biographical. Eugene m1999 (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 22:16, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugene m1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will address this again, the other account was created because the article that I am writing is being deleted repeatedly even tho it shouldn't be, I am always trying to perfect it under the Wikipedia guidelines but it is immediately suggested for speedy deletion without any warnings and without any chance for me to change what is wrong with it! The disputes still haven't been answered! The account should be unblocked because it was in the first place the article that was created by me was speedily deleted without any warning and it should be restored as well because I was writing of an upcoming Eurovision celebrity who is popular in the Eurovision community, I have understood that some words should have been changed to sound not promoting in any way but rather biographical.Eugene m1999 (talk) 13:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So rather than address the problems with your editing you thought you'd break a few more of the site's rules by creating other accounts? That's not encouraging, and strongly suggests that you are here to push an agenda rather than contribute to an encyclopedia. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eugene m1999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason is that my account should not have been blocked in the first place, I understood the problem right now please unblock me Eugene m1999 (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are legitimate ways to contest a deletion or request that an article be undeleted. Creating sock puppets to continue to recreate deleted pages is not one of them. You seem to show no understanding of why your actions were disruptive, so it would not be wise to unblock you. At the very least, I recommend that you read through Wikipedia:Sock puppetry and Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Once you have done that, you may understand enough to write an unblock request that follows the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. You will have to use WP:UTRS to request an unblock, however. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unblock requests are repetitive and disruptive. I've revoked your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]