User talk:Eva basil

I cancel this contribution and would like to delete the page!

Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov

It's been around for a long time, so it would be better to PROD it, so other can say they wish to keep the article (if they want). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. —Bruce1ee^talk 12:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov. Mark91it's my world 16:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You cannot delete an article, even if you have written it yourself. When you click on "Save page" on the button, you are agreeing to release the content you write in CC-BY-SA 3 so that anyone can edit it, use it and redistribute it. It is not yours anymore. However, you can put a PROD tag on the article, and if nobody objects the article will be deleted in a week's time.--Mark91it's my world 16:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else already blocked me - I posted PROD on the front page, Please delete the article in a week. Thank you. The contenet is not authorised and legal any more!!!!

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or submit a request for unblock to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This articel is PROD, I am the author of it to calim for it - the content is NOT legal or authorised any more and I wsn NOT paid for my job.

Proposed deletion of Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov

The article Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fixing PROD tag. Creator requested deletion ([1]), PRODed as the article has had a large number of contributors. Also see User talk:Eva basil.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eva basil. You have new messages at Phil Bridger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Going about this the wrong way

Eva, I've protected the page to prevent you from re-adding the prod tag again. The prod tag is not going to work. It only works if no one objects to the deletion; if anyone objects, the page can't be deleted. Phil Bridger is evidently willing to discuss this with you on his talk page; he knows what he is talking about, please listen to him. I'm afraid if you re-add the prod tag again when the page protection expires, I'm going to have to block your account from editing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented at User talk:Phil Bridger as well, please discuss there. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but if you aren't going to discuss this, and if you're going to edit war, then you give up any part in deciding how things end up. I've blocked your account from editing. If you will agree to discuss this, and not re-add any tags to the article, I will unblock. The standard block template is below. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

{unblock|unfair blocking! I am the author of the article and request it to be deleted because I was abused and not paid for my work by the person mentioned in the article!! I NEED THIS PAGE TO BE COMPLETELY DELETED!!}}

Deletion discussion

I've started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov about whether this article should be deleted. I'll ask Floquenbeam whether you can be allowed to edit in order to take part in that discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eva, at Phil's request, I've unblocked your account to allow you to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov. I really must insist that you DO NOT blank or add PROD/CSD tags to the article anymore, or I will reblock. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

The reason of your block is continuing disrutpive editing at the article Vladimir Mikhailovich Zakharov. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eva basil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

authors request of speedy deletion of the page! DONT BLOCK ME ANY MORE BETTER DELETE THIS PAGE!! I WILL NEVER AGREE TO KEEP IT!

Decline reason:

It is not your page anymore; it is Wikipedia's. We are not concerned with your whether or not you were paid; we are not your debt collection agency. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:43, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.