User talk:Fijiwahwah

Fijiwahwah, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fijiwahwah! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Foundational Black Americans

Hello, Fijiwahwah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foundational Black Americans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Foundational Black Americans

Hello, Fijiwahwah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Foundational Black Americans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foundational Black Americans

I've posted at WP:RSN about this. I also don't think it's notable as it doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Doug Weller talk 08:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Foundational Black American for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foundational Black American is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundational Black American until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Doug Weller talk 12:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not !vote twice

You !voted twice[1][2] on the deletion discussion for Foundational Black American. Please don't do that. —DIYeditor (talk) 08:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 09:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]