User talk:FireBrigadeFanaticNO1

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 15:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salvage Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AEC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Firefighting!

Hello FireBrigadeFanaticNO1, and thank you for your contributions relating to firefighting! Based off of your edits, you may be interested in joining WikiProject Firefighting, which was created recently after WikiProject Fire Services and WikiProject Fire Protection combined. Adding yourself to the participants list shows you are interested or willing to help improve the coverage of firefighting and it's related topics on Wikipedia, but there is no obligation. For more information, feel free to contact me or ask a question on the project's talk page. Happy editing 🙂 Johnson524 05:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning/Afternoon Johnson,

I have put my name down for this project. I would love to see it grow! Honestly I cannot think that other people are interested with it in other countries.

Personally we should add pages that were kick-started by members into a list to show how much we contribute to amazing pieces of history (Although it may not be yet in some areas)!

Many thanks for telling me about this,

FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for joining 🙂 If you can think of a way to further improve the project page, I invite you to BE BOLD! This is the first time I've ever created a WikiProject, so any suggestions on how to make it better/more appealing are much appreciated. Wishing you the best from North Carolina, and thank you again for your interest and contributions to firefighting on Wikipedia. Johnson524 00:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Southport Fire Brigade moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Southport Fire Brigade. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning/Afternoon Sir/Madam,

Many thanks for your suggestions, I have added some sources but Wikipedia should not be one man making an article. There is some information which some may not know about whilst others will. And for that I would like to have Southport Fire Brigade at least released to let others edit in information which is hard to find or they may only know! And unfortunately also, many pieces of history are always physical. Meaning it will get to a point which 'Word-Of-Mouth' may have to be used. And its unfortunate it can't be stopped in some situations.

Many thanks,

FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southport Fire Brigade (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are needed to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southport Fire Brigade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 13:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FireBrigadeFanaticNO1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 13:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helmets Limited moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Helmets Limited. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning (at least for me haha) ma'am,

I should have put it as a draft, my apologies. I was half asleep when i published it and just needed sleep so didn't really think. I'll be working on it more and gathering more information about it.

I've had to wait for a reply also about draft:Southport Fire Brigade as im slightly confused about what it means by the sources part? Maybe you could help me and give some pointers about if it's ready for publishing?

Many thanks, FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helmet Integrated Systems moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Helmet Integrated Systems. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and per first edit summary. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justi yaya 03:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FireBrigadeFanaticNO1! I think you intended to create the page as a draft per Special:Permalink/1199819451. Try to submit your first few articles through AFC as they'd give some good feedback until you get the hang of writing new articles.

Also note that there was a discussion in 2016 for the subject you are writing about to be deleted. Please review the notability guidelines and makes sure that the subject meets them Justi yaya 03:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also WP:Article Wizard makes you a draft :D Justi yaya 03:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning/Afternoon Sir/Madam

I did intend for it to be a draft. I had noticed that later on doing draft:Helmets Limited that it was still around, although under a different name. So, yes the article was made on the 28th of Jan (For me at least), sources were found originally for Helmets Limited;

It was a mistake I did publishing it. Thanks for making it one.

Although how could i go about finding the deleted page for Helmet Integrated Systems Limited? Do I request it etc?

Many Thanks, FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 (talk) 12:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion would be the place to go. Please consider the notability guidelines and make sure the subject meets it. Justi yaya 12:23, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks :), FireBrigadeFanaticNO1 (talk) 12:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FireBrigadeFanaticNO1. Thank you for your work on Glasgow Salvage Corps. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work. This article has no sources which cover the topic of the article. I searched and found that they do exist. The article badly needs to have sources about the topic of the article added. I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Helmets Limited

Hello, FireBrigadeFanaticNO1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Helmets Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Helmet Integrated Systems

Hello, FireBrigadeFanaticNO1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Helmet Integrated Systems, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helmet Integrated Systems (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LR.127 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

1st and 6th source, for example, are user-generated content. 9th source, heavily referenced, is YouTube, which is not a reliable source (also user-generated). Could not establish notability from my searches.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helmet Integrated Systems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LR.127 (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]