User talk:Frankonno

Welcome!

Hello, Frankonno, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Friedrich "Fritz" Braun, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NtheP (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Friedrich "Fritz" Braun

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Friedrich "Fritz" Braun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 17:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Friedrich "Fritz" Braun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friedrich "Fritz" Braun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedrich "Fritz" Braun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NtheP (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You said, at my talk page that you are "NOT a Neo-Nazi." I never said you were, and I'm wondering if somebody did. SilverCityChristmasIsland 23:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploads

A few of your image uploads were recently deleted because they were tagged with an improper licensing tag. {{wikipedia-screenshot}} is only used for images which are a screenshot of a Wikipedia article, often used for commentary and maintenance within Wikipedia rather than in the articles themselves. You are welcome to re-upload the images with proper sourcing, and select a more appropriate licensing tag for the images. Let me know if you need help with this process. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Eva and Ilse Braun 1913.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eva and Ilse Braun 1913.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Braun article

Please refrain from changes to lead-main article photos (as you have done herein) without first obtaining Wikipedia:Consensus, as is Wikipedia policy. Further, photos uploaded have to be properly licensed, free images or they will be removed by a bot program or one of the patrolling members (not me). See: Wikipedia:Non-free content. Since you are new to Wikipedia, I would encourage you to read up on Wikipedia policies and ask questions should you have any. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 02:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Frankonno (talk) 12:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Braun Family

A tag has been placed on Braun Family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:KoppensteinerFamily123.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KoppensteinerFamily123.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and image work

Hi! I think it is wonderful that you are here, as you are a person so connected with an historically important family.

Reading from the above, I know you've bumped into some walls regarding policies and guidelines here at Wikipedia. I was asked by User:Kierzek to offer assistance to you in the area of images and their copyrights. I am at your disposal to do so. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi guys. Frank already left me a request for help on my page. Kierzek is more than welcome to step in there and see if I missed anything and help out (or even take the lead) with this. My response (questions for you, Frank) is located here. Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 00:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Side note, I've removed the talkback msg on your page. You only need to leave a talkback message (on my page, not here) if you respond to me here as opposed to responding to me on my page. If you respond on my page, I get a notice on my screen, as well as an email alert. Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 00:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rob, I think you guys have things well in hand. I had asked Hammersoft to assist because he has extensive knowledge as to Wikipedia photo policies. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kierzek, hopefully. Few issues to resolve still.

Frank: please see the comments on my talk page. ASAP before the image gets speedily deleted. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 00:39, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New message... ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 01:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evabraun2 large.jpg

Hi there, File:Evabraun2 large.jpg is a good addition to the Eva Braun article, thanks!

But I just need to check; do you have a source for the image (where it was first published) so it's verifiably her? And do you know when it was first published(because it's highly unlikely to be before 1925, as the current license says). Thanks! Peter (talk) 11:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated this file for deletion, as it does not say who took the photo or whether or not we have their permission to use it. It is virtually impossible that it was taken before 1923 as Braun was born in 1912 and is certainly not eleven years old in this photo. Please get the licensing straightened out or the file will be deleted soon. We cannot keep File:Eva and Ilse Braun 1913.jpg either, if it is actually owned by Getty Images, so I have tagged it for deletion. Sorry. --Dianna (talk) 04:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bridgiddowling.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bridgiddowling.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flora and Elias Disney.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flora and Elias Disney.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]