User talk:FriendsFan8

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spider Man: 3 (2021) (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Film hasn't commenced principal photography and does not have an official title yet. This isn't the appropriate title anyway.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spider Man: 3 (2021) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spider Man: 3 (2021), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FriendsFan8! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok but it has to be created before 2021. FriendsFan8 (talk) 20:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Holland and rumours

Hello FriendsFan8. Please be sure that any additions to articles adhere to BLP policy. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zendaya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Zendaya, you may be blocked from editing. Specifically this edit ... One, this is gossip and no guarantee this is a long-term relationship that is notable by Wikipedia standards ... and Two, at least one of the sources cited is WP:NOTRS (the UK's Daily Mail is absolutely not reliable; please refer to the discussions about it thru WP:DAILYMAIL/WP:RSP). If you continue to add this information, you may be reported. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Holland. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]