User talk:Garzane

Star wars episode 7 return of the discipals

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Star wars episode 7 return of the discipals, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hawaiian717 23:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Darth Vader. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darry2385 01:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Armada, Michigan, you will be blocked from editing. Darry2385 01:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter (character), you will be blocked from editing. Darry2385 01:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

The edit to Harry Potter didn't deserve the level 4 warning, my apologies. And I didn't PROD your star wars article, that was another editor. Please take that up with that editor, who can be found in the page's history. If you have any other questions, please utilize my talk page instead of creating a subpage in my namespace. Thanks. Darry2385 01:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new page

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Tales of silo) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Xiahou 01:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Betrayal

You can't copy and paste a review like that its copyright infringment see [[1]] please remove that section. You can break it down and reword it so its not. Not that I mind also but others I am sure will complain about the length of it reguardless of the copyright. --Xiahou 02:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Darth Vader, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You've had ample warnings. Shape up. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've deleted Star wars episode 7 return of the discipals. Please stop creating articles for bogus, or at best non-notable, topics. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 18:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Toa valtan

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Toa valtan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Toa valtan seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Toa valtan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Andrews, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Andrews was changed by Garzane (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-10-16T19:27:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]