User talk:Gazt1

Welcome!

Hi Gazt1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

AfC notification: Draft:William Ernest Weeks has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Ernest Weeks. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Ernest Weeks has been accepted

William Ernest Weeks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article William Ernest Weeks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable in his own right. He gets passing mention in all of the reliable sources or is simply named in them. issuu.com is far from a reliable source, and that is the only entry that is even close to being WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC) (:) Thank you Walter Görlitz for expressing your concerns. I share your energy to keep Wikipedia accurate, but do not agree with you in this case. The Issuu article is a stored article from United K-pop (https://unitedkpop.com) and their UKP-magazine, which I experience as one of the most established of the relatively few editorial niche magazines in the West that write about K-pop, and most of the internal links in turn link to lists like Oricon and Billboard's copyright information. Together with information on mr Weeks social media, website, and what other songwriters within J-pop and K-pop's write in their social media, as well as information on the Asian sub-publishers web and communication channels (https://soundgraphics.net/en/creators/willie-weeks), it verifies that the person in the article is the one he is claimed to be. That the above is not linked is of course because they are not official sources, yet they paint a consistent picture that is strengthened by the article from United K-pop as well as the copyright information. I agree that this article can be built on more links, which the community can contribute with me, but that it should be deleted I object. Quite contrary the article seems similar to other Wikipedia articles about songwriters and producers in K-pop and J-pop. I believe the shortage of coverage rather expresses that the musicians behind K-pop and J-pop are quite neglected areas on Wikipedia, as well as in the western consciousness in general, compared to how big the genres have become these last years. But I believe that this will change with the spread of the genre and I hope that both you and I could add content and enrich these this part of wikipedia together with the rest of the community. Since I'm pretty new to contributing to Wikipedia, please elaborate on how this article is different from other articles about similar songwriters in J-pop and K-pop and your thoughts about what internal and external linking that could make the article better. Have a nice day! Kindest regards Gazt1 (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyler Niko (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:MUSIC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyler Niko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyler Niko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah!^💬 18:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gazt1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah!^💬 18:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Fatal Love (album), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Nangears (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyler Niko (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyler Niko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyler Niko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 16:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geek Boy (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geek Boy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Geek Boy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kyler Niko

Hello, Gazt1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kyler Niko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Geek Boy

Hello, Gazt1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geek Boy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kyler Niko

Hello, Gazt1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kyler Niko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Geek Boy

Hello, Gazt1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geek Boy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]