User talk:Gboyeaig11

Nomination of Adesayo Oyedijo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adesayo Oyedijo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesayo Oyedijo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 23:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am highly surprised and very perturbed that Wikic¤l¤gy stated that the artcile on Adesayo Oyedijo does not meet the WP:ACADEMIC threshold. This is still shocking to me having read his own profile with just one Newspaper resource. I wonder why someone like Wikicology can be on wikipedia and Professsor Oyedijo with all his exceptional profile cannot be on wikipedia for the world to see. User:Vanamonde93 also stated that his profile reads like a resume. I totally disagree with with opinion because those are his achievements. A professor of that caliber with such achievements who got to the peak of his career deserves to be seen by the world. However, I support the opinion that this page should be kept. You may suggest ways to improve the page but deleting it would be absolutely improper. I vote for his page to be kept.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Odd edit to User:Wikicology

Hi Gboyeaig11 - could you explain what you were trying to do in this edit? (pinging @Wikicology:) -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, additionally, why did you create an article entitled Wikicology? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User:Wikicology, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gboyeaig11: I've now warned you as your actions seem to be along the lines of a personal attack. Please discuss this, and do not tag the user's page again otherwise you will be blocked -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesayo Oyedijo deletion discussion

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesayo Oyedijo deletion discussion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplication of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesayo Oyedijo

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Wikicology. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Cahk (talk) 21:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More disruptive editing

Your "contested deletion" to Wikicology makes no sense - this is just verging on being disruptive. Please take the time to reply here and explain what you're trying to achieve - currently your actions are just going to get you blocked -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

samtar I have taken my action because after closely examining Wikicology page, it makes sense in my opinion that subject on this page is not a notable person. The article also lacks reliable, suitable and valuable sources as it should. Also I do not think being a manager on the Wikipedia education programme in Nigeria is enough to meet WP:Notability threshold. Sources provided are not about him and the only source is unreliable. The subject is only performing is duties at his job and nothing more. I am not trying to be disruptive here or verging like you stated. This are just my concerns about this page after taking a very close look. Please examine the page before you refer to my action as makes no sense. I do not appreciate this abusive communicating style.

You created the Wikicology page though..? I'm struggling to assume good faith here, as you seem to be attacking Wikicology as revenge for nominating your article for deletion - you're even quoting part of his nomination "The subject is only performing is duties at his job and nothing more". -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 22:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

samtar I did not create the page. I attempted to put it forward for deletion. This is because Wikicology made comments that were not valid in my opinion. After reading through his profile which is on Wikipedia, I felt it was just unfair for his page to be on Wikipedia and mine being asked to be deleted. I looked at his profile carefully out of frustration and I sincerely thought it also did not meet certain requirements such as Notability, Suitable sources etc. I then had to quote him subject simply performing his duties/job because that was simply interpreted from his profile. When an article like mine about a top academic in Nigeria is being filed for deletion, I saw no reason why Wikicology should be on Wikipedia due to its unworthiness. This article took me 4 weeks to create and suddenly all my hard work is being thrown away. The least I expected was a constructive feedback like samtar about the photos for Adesayo Oyedijo. I feel its completely unfair.

Yes, you created the Wikicology page - see the proof for yourself - see the bottom of the history, where is says Gboyeaig11 (talk contribs)‎ . . (1,241 bytes) (+1,241)‎ . . (←Created page. Please do not lie to us, it won't help. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 22:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that was attempt to file for deletion. There is nothing to lie about here. I told you I filed for Wikicology to be deleted as well. I do not understand where lying comes in and how it wouldn't help me.

File copyright problem with File:Adesayo Oyedijo.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Adesayo Oyedijo.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 21:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your constructive feedback. Although you have already voted for the article which the photo is for to be deleted. So your recommendation might not be useful. samtar talk