User talk:Geniuswas95

Welcome

Hello, Geniuswas95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page ‎64-iber Great Cannon have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Calaka (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 49ers (band) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Gamgadhi. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:05, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Ken Hansen, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Danger (talk) 02:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Christmas novels, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of Christmas novels was changed by Geniuswas95 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-11-05T02:08:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Khatangi, you will be blocked from editing. Danger (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- The Anome (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi Geniuswas,

A large amount of your contributions, such as this one, this one and this one, are being removed as incorrect. Please do not add material for which you do not have sources. Please do not invent classifications for dinosaurs, please do not invent meanings for names, etc. Other editors are having to revert some or much of the material you are adding. If you continue to add unsourced or incorrect content, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Firsfron of Ronchester 07:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 22:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From your edit history, the negative value of your vandal edits clearly outweighs any positive value of your others, which (pace above comment) is moot in any case. Rodhull andemu 22:58, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]