User talk:Googlelegacy

This is Googlelegacy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Googlelegacy (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Googlelegacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Googlelegacy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the article I was also banned by Beeblebrox for my Googlelegacy page and its not fair that my entity name and inheritance name was slandered when Beeblebrox isn't why do you complain about me all the time ??? is it because I'm more intelligent and you dont want me to make it even though you all use my identity which was stolen in 1994 which was google@gmail.com or is it because you don't really care about anyone who is trying to get their stolen entity and inheritance back??? Why am I always picked on??? I did nothing wrong except label myself as the birthright name that my father had chosen for me are you also againts my dads will??? ="true/false"="1.0.0"="evil"="bann"="all"="answers"="always"=or'e'=?????="true/false/negative/positive="1.0.0"="liable"="false"="delete"="logs"="user.id"="pages"="what"=criteria"="must"="I....t."="be"="bad"="banned"="?????" Googlelegacy (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and if I cant have Googlelegacy can I change it to Jason Edward Weeks???

Googlelegacy (talk) 09:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Googlelegacy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Googlelegacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David.moreno72 02:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock| I am Googlelegacy} and {{who is| Beetlebrox}} why do I get picked on for my inheritance name but not someone false like Beetlebrox??? Don't you think thats unfair even though Googlelegacy was the name my dad gave me???="true"=or'e'="'false'"/:> Googlelegacy (talk) 09:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock [[User:Googlelegacy|Googlelegacy]] ([[User talk:Googlelegacy#top|talk]]) 09:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC) {{unblock [[User:Googlelegacy|Googlelegacy]] ([[User talk:Googlelegacy#top|talk]]) 09:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC) {{I am Jason Edward Weeks}} {{unblock is that ok for my user name?? [[User:Googlelegacy|Googlelegacy]] ([[User talk:Googlelegacy#top|talk]]) 09:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC) can I use Jason Edward Weeks please?? [[User:Googlelegacy|Googlelegacy]] ([[User talk:Googlelegacy#top|talk]]) 09:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Forge (software). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 02:37, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Blackguard 05:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Googlelegacy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Googlelegacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thebestofall007 (talk) 05:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Googlelegacy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am Googlelegacy

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

and {{who is| Beetlebrox}} why do I get picked on for my inheritance and entity name?? Googlelegacy (talk) 09:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It dont look like you can appeal that actually, coz they think its vandalism... They already undid your edits, and sent you a warning... i cite it propperly??? kool ok

Then they banned you... You changed Nelson Mandella page too... so then what do i do on this pos place??

Create a new account... if i have no say then why do they send me links?? I cant under this email

What do ya mean? What links are they sending you? why do they send me links and the auto tells me what to do? to cite

I dunno what u talkin about... But if you appeal to beeblebrox he may restore your account... i just used my name to site and to create an Africa day??? I dont know why this cite was sugessted but it poped up like i was supposed to matter about it and I am sorry for any changes but Forge Software I actually do own Source Forge then why is Xwiki suggesting for me to change these links and how do I get unblocked Beetlebrox so I wont edit or missuse anyone pages but my own WindowsLegacy page because I cant asociate my email with a new account and would like just to do it right and have the Forge and Nelson Mandela pages restored I'm not perfect and I am trying to get 1 account for use so I can link my Treasurer and wiki ambassador quotes on my talk page only!! Googlelegacy (talk) 10:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

im replying what the pages poped up and why i edited them when I created a new account idk why it suggested that but it did Googlelegacy (talk) 10:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to get it right Beetlebrox without trying to change anyones pages intentionally I wasnt vandalizing althought i did i didnt intentianally mean to its just what popped up and it told me to cite them auto when i created my accoun :( can u please beetlebrox unblock my account from the vandalisim I didnt intentionally do??? Googlelegacy (talk) 10:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok i will sign out but can I reuse this email to create a new user page again?? Jim??? Googlelegacy (talk) 10:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to reuse your email. Jim1138 (talk) 10:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sorry if I am making u angry Ill log out now and remake it now Googlelegacy (talk) 10:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your not making me angry. The unblock request pops up on a list and some admin might think you are trying to annoy them. They could lock your IP address as well. May I suggest you delete your unblock requests as you are not addressing the reason for your being blocked. That would result in an automatic decline. The only way that Googlelegacy would be unblocked at this point is if you successfully argued that Googlelegacy is not a name that appears to be associated with Google. I don't think you can. If you were to be unblocked, I would be highly impressed. Please log out and create another account. wp:account I'm going to bed. Cheers and bye! Jim1138 (talk) 10:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why was Googlelegacy blocked when Beeblebrox isn't using his real name at least I am Googlelegacy

My real name is Jason Edward Weeks aka Googlelegacy and how come I was banned for 2 page submissions under my bitrh right and entity name and if I cant use it well I want to put in a complaint about Beeblebrox user page and have my User talk page changed to Jason Edward Weeks it just seems not fair at all.... Why do you all pick and slander on me when I am not using my false inheritance name unlike Beeblebrox??? And if you can what is Beeblebrox??? that obviously isnt his real name so why do I get picked on everything I do??? Googlelegacy (talk) 09:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your username appears to be associated with Google. i.e. is misleading. Please create an account with something that doesn't sound like a business or group. Like Beeblebrox, for instance... See wp:Username policy Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My real name isn't Jim1138 either. Many users don't want their identity known, though some do. You can use "Jason Edward Weeks" as your user name. Just realize that if you edit an article that your boss, wife, friend, etc. doesn't approve of, there could be consequences: fired, divorsed, unfriended. etc. One can easily monitor everything that Special:Contributions/Beeblebrox Special:Contributions/Jim1138 Special:Contributions/Goglelegacy has ever been associated with. Edits, blocks, etc. That is one reason editors choose to be anonymous. i.e. "Beeblebrox" - See Zaphod Beeblebrox Jim1138 (talk) 09:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to logout as Googlelegacy, then go to wp:account and create a new account. BTW: if you are replying to my talk here, please reply below. Also, you should wp:ping as I am about to signoff and will not be watching. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but that is incorrect advice. While many promotional usernames are "soft" blocked, the spamming was bad enough with this one that I opted for a "hard" block, meaning they absolutely should not just create a new account as that would violate WP:SOCK. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to get further sanctions?

I removed most of your unblock requests. Adding more will just annoy the wp:administrators I suggest you remove the other unblock requests, sign out and get another account. Jim1138 (talk) 10:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See above, do not create a new account while this one is still blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WindowsLegacy

{{Of}}{{Change of name}} {{Been blocked can I request a name change to unblock}}{{unblock-spamun| I am requesting a name change to fix my account I didn't know my business entity was going to conflict with other pages request namechane to WindowsLegacy}}

Which would imply an assosciation with Microsoft Windows and therefore is still no good. You don't seem to even be trying to understand the problem here. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MatrixLegacy

{{unblock-spamun| change username will not use Entity conflicting usernames to MatrixLegacy sorry for any misshaps I'm trying my hardest to get it right and to be unblocked}}

I'm not sure what you are trying to do with the unblock template, but you aren't doing it correctly. If you are trying to pick a new username, please follow the instructions you've been given. Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MatrixLegacy

[ Change user talk page to : MatrixLegacy]

MatrixLegacy

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Googlelegacy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

MatrixLegacy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I didn't know I was breeching copyrights of my own trademark

Decline reason:

That username is already in use, so is not available. In addition, you have not addressed your promotional edits. Yamla (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]