User talk:Gorilla1978

June 2017

Hello, I'm Valenciano. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Open Episcopal Church have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Valenciano (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Open Episcopal Church shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Valenciano (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Malicious Editing and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,. Integrity4488hope (talk) 23:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Required discussion for moderated content dispute resolution

I'm posting this to both your and Integrity4488hope's talk pages. You're being advised at several different places to use content dispute resolution, but you should know that the moderated content dispute resolution venues — Third Opinion, Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, and Formal Mediation — all require extensive talk page discussion before they will accept a request for dispute resolution and will not take edit summaries into account in determining whether sufficient discussion has occurred. (And they will also ignore any discussion which is about conduct rather than content in making that determination. If the discussion is about an editor's motives, intentions, biases, conflicts of interest, skills, habits, competence, POV, POV-pushing, or anything else about the editor then that discussion is about conduct, not content.) Requests filed in those venues without adequate talk page discussion are uniformly rejected. So, if you wish to pursue this further the first thing to do is to try to talk it out on the Open Episcopal Church talk page. If a party will not engage in discussion, but continues to edit the article in the area of dispute, consider the advice given at DISCFAIL. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC) (Not watching this page)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Open Episcopal Church has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Open Episcopal Church was changed by Gorilla1978 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2017-06-24T09:00:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration Special:Permalink/787495489#Malicious Editing Closed

This is to inform you that the request for arbitration in which you were named as a party has been declined by the arbitration committee and closed. GoldenRing (talk) 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]