User talk:Grandbelle

Grandbelle, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Grandbelle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Rmosler2100. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Ved Sharma, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rmosler | ● 12:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC) thank you will put it in future[reply]

Removing red links[edit]

Please do not remove red links from articles as you had done in Babur. As per WP:REDDEAL, "red links serve the purpose of notifying readers that a need exists in Wikipedia for the creation of a new article". These usually shouldn't be removed unless they obviously cannot be expanded into an article. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again please do not remove red links, as you did at Navin Nischol. You have been warned about this already. Tknifton (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 75 Satellites (May 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:75 Satellites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:75 Satellites, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Solanki moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pooja Solanki, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]