User talk:Grangjatt

March 2021

Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Baghel Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hari Singh Nalwa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 14:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ranjit Singh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Hi Grangjatt, it is probably best to start a discussion on the article's talk page so you can gain consensus for your changes. S0091 (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

S0091 (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How should communication work in the Wikipedia Android app?

Hi!

You are getting this message because you are a user of the Wikipedia Android app and have edited Wikipedia through the app. We are working on notifications in the app. This is important because it helps others to contact you to help you or discuss something with you. If you are interested and have time, we would be very interested in your feedback on how to best improve communication in the app. You can answer our survey on mediawiki.org or in Google Forms.

Thank you. For the Android team, Johan (WMF).

17:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that in this edit to Punjab National Bank, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Insertion of the term "Jat" and removal of the term "Muslim" "Hindu"

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Such distinction between Jat and ~~Muslim~~ Hindu need to be discussed and agreed by contributors. The encyclopedia is not a battleground for nationalist semantics. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for inserting the term 'Muslim' when I should have noted 'Hindu'; I have struck and amended my previous comment and heading. Regardless, you are apparently editing to an agenda and without discussion and would strongly suggest you desist from doing so, LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LessHeard vanU what happened sir. hindu. muslim which agenda. I am not interested in it Grangjatt (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LessHeard vanU hindu is religion and Jat is caste. I mention Jat caste only Grangjatt (talk) 19:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The encyclopedia is read by people who wish to learn about a subject - while adding material can be beneficial, it should not be done so at the expense of other material which likely more easily and readily understood. Hinduism as a religion peculiar to the Indian subcontinent and recognised as such. It is also considered a culture of ancient and recent history, whereas the caste system is not known or poorly understood outside of India and neighbouring countries. Substituting Jat for Hindu, or removing Hindu from the text is likely to confuse the casual user. If a discussion is opened with other editors about the appropriate degree of linking to the caste, or indicating in the text why the caste is especially relavent to the subject, then this would resolve the issue. I trust I have made clear why it is important to include all appropriate information, and not removing existing text. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LessHeard vanU ok if you have problem with religion then I have not changed it... Grangjatt (talk) 14:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issue with the religion, but am advising you that it is a better indicator of the culture of the subject than that of a name of a caste. Noting Jat in regard to an individual or dynasty should be sufficient to allow interested parties to click the link, but removing Hindu lowers the quality of the article. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LessHeard vanU Jat is caste not religion. you find jat caste in hindu. sikh. muslim easily in India & Pakistan... Grangjatt (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My last comment here is that Hindu, Sikh, and Muslim are understood in the English speaking countries as a culture as well as a religion (certain styles of literature, art, and clothing styles are thought as being particular to one or other) and also a geographical location - whereas only those English speakers who are very familiar with Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi culture via contact are even aware of the caste system and, such as I, have no depth of understanding of it. Of itself, the word Jat does not inform the reader about the subject. The religion and its region does. Therefore the latter must be kept. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jind State, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vif12vf hlp bro. why I edit wikipedia for easily read information. why u sent msg me. I do not understand. I edit correct information about every topic Grangjatt (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patiala State. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nabha State, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vif12vf which disruptive editing. I fill correct information and I have many proof of them. if you want I sent you Grangjatt (talk) 03:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Faridkot State. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dholpur State, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continued disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生 why man? wikipedia is deleted correct information fill by me and blocked me for two weeks. why? Grangjatt (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tomar clan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 13:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Anangpal Tomar, you may be blocked from editing. your edit was directly contrary to the cited ref - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomara dynasty. - Arjayay (talk) 15:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay i add correct information Grangjatt (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Asigarh Fort‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]