User talk:Greyjoy/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

copyvio

If it's "Largely copyright violation from official website" (diff) please request revision deletion of those revisions which are problematic. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 10:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your hint. I take note concerning the exact meaning of "Minor edit" for the future. Sorry for having been unaware of that. Cordially, L. Nikogosyan Nikogosyan (talk) 11:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall_F.C.

Thanks for your note about the former players section and I understand the Wikipedia guidelines concerning citations.

The following section is accurate (and Southall FC's current chairman is pictured making the presentation), however currently this event is not referenced anywhere else online. I am authorised to update the Southall F.C. Wikipedia page by the club and have been adding information and images.

I am in contact with Southall F.C. regarding the citation and hopefully something will be added to their official website that will verify the accuracy of this section.

If you would be able to bear with me, I am actively looking into rectifying this so the event described can be referenced and verified.

On 14 October 2017, the grandson and great grandson of Charles Roach, who holds the record for most goals in a season for Southall FC (57), were guests of the club for Southall's Spartan South Midlands League Division One home game at Burnham FC's The Gore, against Brimsdown. Charles' grandson Brian Roach (pictured right), who grew up in Southall and watched the team play at Western Road, was at the game as part of his 75th birthday celebrations with his son Mark (Charles' great grandson). He talked to the Southall players in the dressing room before the game and the club presented him with a framed Southall FC shirt on the pitch prior to kick-off. Southall won 5-1, on their way to winning the 2017-18 Division One title. Brian is a former Reading FC director and was agent for former Chelsea and England striker Kerry Dixon, Arsenal and England defender Lee Dixon, Chelsea, Liverpool and Scotland striker David Speedie, and Arsenal winger Brian Marwood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Roach Southall FC (talk • contribs) 13:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Mark Roach Southall FC, if you are "authorised to update the Southall F.C. Wikipedia page by the club" then you have a conflict of interest and should follow the instructions left on your talk page by Ezlev a few months ago. Greyjoy ^talk 14:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

I confirm that I do not have any official role or link with Southall FC and they did not ask for me to represent them in any way in updating the Southall FC Wikipedia page. By use of the word 'authorised' I simply meant that the club is aware that I am doing updates.Mark Roach Southall FC (talk) 14:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Roach Southall FC (talk • contribs) 14:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Cubbington Sources

Hi,

I have added a source now.

Thanks,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomE5000 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Page Correction

I have updated the page for Danny Duncan with a reliable source. Sorry for the confusion, I am fairly new to Wikipedia. Thanks for the heads up. Let me know if there is anything else I need to clarify or fix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rileyrutter (talk • contribs) 06:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Rileyrutter I want to thank you for taking the time to try and improve Wikipedia, however the source you have used is not considered reliable. I am going to leave a welcome message on your talk page which has some useful links for getting started on Wikipedia. Greyjoy ^talk 06:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I just updated the Danny Duncan page with his birthday from a reliable source. The source is a video on YouTube from a channel that spoke to Danny Duncan's assistant directly and gathered the information. Thanks for helping me out at the beginning. Let me know if there is anything else I should do. Thanks again. Rileyrutter (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Awards and nominations received by Natalie Mars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Awards and nominations received by Natalie Mars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rocco Siffredi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

This is a group AfD. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Dream11 reversal

Hi there, This is in reference to a recent change which you undid. The link provided for reference by IP address 103.146.240.40 is not accurate and not in reference to the page in question. The link added for reference is of a completely different org. kindly show me how to make reversals with justification. So that my changes are not reversed/rolled back — Preceding unsigned comment added by RohitSridhar1994 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

RohitSridhar1994, not accurate how? The references provided state that Harsh Jain, Bhavit Sheth & Varun Daga co-founded the organisation. Greyjoy ^talk 09:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for a speedy response, Dream11 is a product of Sporta Technologies - https://www.tofler.in/sporta-technologies-private-limited/company/U72900MH2007PTC171875 . The link presented above is of a company that was dissolved long back. Current information about promoters is inaccurate.

I am going to continue this discussion on the article talk page so that other editors can join in as well. Greyjoy ^talk 09:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Completely missed your message about secondary sources - Attaching reliable secondary source for your reference - https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/86107-24#overview — Preceding unsigned comment added by RohitSridhar1994 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/companies/the-rise-rise-of-dream11-and-fantasy-sports-gaming-in-india/articleshow/68543816.cms - Kindly scroll down to find "How it started" This is from Times of India who are considered as a source of reliable news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RohitSridhar1994 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I am discussing this with you on the article talk page, please keep the discussion on that page. Greyjoy ^talk 10:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Bruce Woodcock Page

Hi GreyJoy I have Bruce's birth certificate in my possession. He was my grandfather and I also have his son sitting right next to me as I type. The cited reference is the Independent newspaper, which got the date wrong in its obituary for my grandad.

)

Thanks, Ben Woodcock — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyBoyW (talk • contribs) 12:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

BennyBoyW I appreciate that mistakes can happen, however Wikipedia is based on what is reported in accessible reliable sources. Do you have anything published in reliable sources with his birthdate that we can use as a reference for the change? Greyjoy ^talk 12:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Again Either the official BoxRec page (https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/037004) would do as the proper reference or we could arrange to send you a scan of the birth certificate if that would be helpful ? Scanning the birth certificate would probably take a couple of days to organise. Thanks Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyBoyW (talk • contribs) 12:52, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

BennyBoyW the boxrec should do the job, no real point in sending a birth cert to me because it isn't verifiable by other editors. Greyjoy ^talk 14:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

That's great GreyJoy. I will try to get the Independent to correct their online article. Obviously it's almost a quarter of a century too late to correct the printed version ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennyBoyW (talk • contribs) 16:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop deleting

You keep deleting as it is my page and information. Do i need to show u my marriage certificate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpsingh CID (talk • contribs) 13:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Additions require reliable sources, otherwise they will be deleted. Greyjoy ^talk 16:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Edit of BIT Deoghar Page

Why did you edited Remarkable alumni Section , does a Subheading needs to be referenced , I think you have wrongly edited the page

BCS 12 (talk) 05:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Names listed as notable people require references showing that they are notable and attended the institute. Greyjoy ^talk 05:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Josh hill footballer

Unverified family information keeps being added. Harassment and trolling has been caused by these unverified edits. Protection of the children mentioned is priority. The deleted information was recently added and is potentially harmful. Bubbachum44 (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Instead of repeatedly removing referenced information, you should take your concerns to the article's talk page. Greyjoy ^talk 14:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Navi (impersonator)

Hello, I'm Beagleforceone. I work closely with Navi (impersonator), and noticed your recent action on his page to alter information. This page is continually being altered with incorrect, disruptive information. Please note that the edits and information that I provide are accurate and authorised by the person named on the page. Please ensure they are always reverted to my edit if they are altered by anyone else. Thank you. (If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page Beagleforceone (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

If you know Navi you should not be editing the article as you have a COI. I have posted more information on editing with a COI on your talk page. Greyjoy ^talk 14:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

KillerWhaleGuy

Are you undoing my edits? Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KillerWhaleGuy (talk • contribs) 07:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

KillerWhaleGuy you will need to be a bit more specific, which edits of mine do you have issue with? Which article are you referring to? Greyjoy ^talk 07:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Greyjoy, there's a history of block evasion and copyright infringement at Luna (killer whale), which is connected to the WP:COI editing at Michael Harris (producer). This could be brought to any one of several noticeboards, but ANI may be the best place for comprehensive action, since multiple users and articles look to be involved. Maybe I'll try during the daylight hours here tomorrow. Cheers, 2601:188:180:B8E0:8804:65CA:7CE3:366C (talk) 07:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I will leave that for you since you have been keeping track of it. Greyjoy ^talk 07:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

3RR report

Hello Greyjoy, I was just about to self-revert my report but noticed you retracted yours, even though it was filed before mine. Please feel free to add anything to the report. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

No worries, your report was more detailed so I removed mine. Commented on your report. Greyjoy ^talk 07:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Just noticed, thank you. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 07:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

midas box edits

Mate,

IMDb is recognised. Just as critics reviews represents critics, IMDb represents audience and users.

Respectfully, can you please stop editing my edits. We can include both on the page.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:F851:1800:136:B67:855A:F652 (talk) 12:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

2A02:C7F:F851:1800:136:B67:855A:F652, IMDb is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. As per [[1]] and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#IMDb. Wikipedia articles are based on the reviews published in reliable sources. Greyjoy ^talk 12:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Pregnancy and Infant Loss Remembrance Day

Mrs Phinch (Ms Coggan) believes that it was her who started the day and will not allow ANYONE to edit the page. Other edits in the past have resulted in her changing the page back. I am not changing anything about herself, just updating the relevant sections that need to be done as the day has now grown and has gotten bigger around the world. Her accusation of extensive vandalism is wrong, the page gets updated/cleaned up regularly by wikipedia editors. I ask that my edits are considered as Ms Coggan has a big COI in the page and only wants to make the reflect that she is the only one who knows anything about this. I have had many exchanges with Ms Coggan regarding this and she is not mentally stable to make any judgments regarding the page.R.Kate De'Laney (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

R.Kate De'Laney this is best discussed on the article talk page, if the problem continues you can begin a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Edit warring and making personal attacks "Ms Coggan regarding this and she is not mentally stable" will just cause you to lose the ability to make edits. Greyjoy ^talk 12:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I see that someone has already began a discussion at the incident board and that the page has been protected. This is the perfect time to discuss on the article talk page and reach a consensus with other editors. Greyjoy ^talk 12:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad Yazbek

Could you please tell me why you have removed Category:20th-century Lebanese people from two articles, thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 07:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

As per the category page, it is listed as a container category. Due to its scope, it should contain only subcategories. Greyjoy ^talk 07:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

What if there is no relevant subcategory? --Egeymi (talk) 07:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Well since the category should only contain categories, if there are no applicable subcats the article is removed from the category (as it should not have been added initially). Greyjoy ^talk 07:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adekoya Adeniyi

You are right. Please delete Bashereyre (talk) 13:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Clement Mouhot

Mouhot is a professional mathematician (of some distinction). His qualifications and achievements are listed in the bibliography on the wikipage and in his CV on his Cambridge website. No formal qualifications in sociology or psychology are listed. There are no relevant subjects listed on his Research (on his website) page either. This puts his actions in context. It might be useful to add a sentence along the lines of: (It should be noted that Prof. Mouhot has no formal qualifications in sociology or psychology.) This is appropriate, given the gravity of the situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friend of all the world (talk • contribs) 10:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

To implement the change you suggested we would need a specific source to reference to support the claim, otherwise it borders on original research. IMO adding "Despite having no expertise in the area" to the start doesn't really improve or add to the text. Greyjoy ^talk 11:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

We could refer to Mouhot's website. There is no record of formal qualifications in the relevant areas on his CV. It is perfectly resonable to infer from that that he is not in possession of such formal qualifications. We are not going to be able to cite a reference which says just that. Such negative statements are reasonably inferred from the lack of evidence to the contrary. For example, I don't list on my CV facts such as: I possess no formal qualifications in Sanscrit.

I disagree with your opinion that it doesn't improve or add to the text. This was a highly controversial action. The fact that many of the chief instigators, including Mouhot, were not competent to judge is highly relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friend of all the world (talk • contribs) 12:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

I would suggest discussing your suggested change on the article talk page so that other editors familiar with the subject can weigh in and a consensus can be reached. Greyjoy ^talk 12:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Akong Rinpoche

Hi there - thanks for helping with the editing. Sorry if I've been making alot of work for you - I am a bit of newbie at this! I noticed that you added back in the link on Akong Rinpoches page which links to page entitled Male Murder victims. To be honest I am not sure why it was there in the first place. Yes, he was murdered and yes he is male as it clearly says on his page and I am in no way disputing this. I know it's not a major issue-it doesn't add or detract from the activities made in his lifetime. I am not questioninng the pages accuracy but I do question why when there are on average 350,000 male murders worldwide committed every year, why out of the millions of murders only a few select individuals are singled out of this on this page? By omitting all the other millions of male murders it does not give a true representation statistically and seems to me to just sensationalising a handful of select individuals and their murders and is therefore in conflict with the ethos of objectivity. If the page was more specific such as murders of famous/notable people etc it would be more representative. But like I say not a major point - just wanted to give my reasons for choosing to omit it. Sarahcannell (talk) 08:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Sarahcannell, if you have an issue with the existence and use of the Category:Male murder victims, you are welcome to start a discussion on the category's talk page. "Why when there are on average 350,000 male murders worldwide committed every year, why out of the millions of murders only a few select individuals are singled out of this on this page", if each of these 350,000 victim had a Wiki page I would add them to the category as well. However most of them do not meet the notability requirements required for Wikipedia. Greyjoy ^talk 11:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Greyjoy Thanks for the advice I didn't know I could add it for discussion on the categories talk page. Is there a link to show me how to do this? Sarahcannell (talk) 12:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Sarahcannell, if you click on the category at the bottom of Rinpoche's page it will take you to the category page, like other articles there is a tab at the top called "Talk", that is where discussions about specific categories can be started. Greyjoy ^talk 14:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Green Leader entry

The photo that was there was one of someone else, not of the subject, Chris Dixon. There is a correct photo of him here: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FEgySe1X8QU/USCWjc7OGDI/AAAAAAAACJ8/mFiopil3Rvo/s200/Ph3+Dixon+OC.jpg I don't know how to deal with that! Thanks.

Burrayu Massacre

Hello, why did you delete my changing back of the Burayu massacre?

There is a user essentially engaging in vandalism on the page. It is getting out of hand and no one is holding them accountable. FightingEthiopianMisinfo (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

FightingEthiopianMisinfo as I said in my edit summary, your edit removed references and referenced material. If you believe that it shouldn't be on the page the next step is to discuss it on the article talk page and reach consensus with other editors. Greyjoy ^talk 10:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	You must be one of the most civilised editors this project possesses, and I'm really happy at having run into you! ——Serial 11:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Appreciate it. Thank you for pointing out my error, it is something I can learn from. Greyjoy ^talk 11:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

A vegan pizza for you!

	A tasty vegan pizza
	For making me laugh with this edit. — Czello 13:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC) P.S. What is dead may never die.

Why must you punish me? But rises again, harder and stronger Greyjoy ^talk 13:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Stratifciation (water)

Hi! I saw you left a message on my talk page regarding the wikipedia page stratification (water). Thanks for the clarification that I have to add an extra section on external links! Now it makes sense why you removed in the body of my text. If there are any other remarks regarding specific rules I might have missed, please do not hesitate to let me know. Hannahvdzande (talk) 12:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

question

question

I am attempting to add citations to a previous upload and I got this message from you? - please advise Tag: Twinkle ← Previous edit Revision as of 09:39, 19 May 2021 (edit) (undo) (thank) Greyjoy (talk | contribs) (Restored revision 1010236760 by 216.106.148.104 (talk): Reverting good faith edits, lacking inline references and written in an unexcyclopedic style not suited for Wikipedia) DDSEXPAT (talk) 10:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

DDSEXPAT that is correct, in this edit I reverted your additions because of the lack of inline references and tone of the additions. I appreciate that you were acting in good faith and trying to improve the page with your changes. You then re-added some of the text, I have made some changes to try and bring your additions more inline with Wikipedia's manual of style. I also left some links on your page with information on how to correctly reference additions on Wikipedia, if there is anything I can do to help please let me know. Greyjoy ^talk 10:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Minor Edits

Dear Greyjoy, I just wanted to thank you for alerting me to my incorrect marking of edits as "minor" and the fact that this term has a specific meaning to Wikipedia. I am new to making contributions to Wikipedia and it will undoubtedly take some time to familarise myself with all the guidelines and regulations. Best regardsLoyalty me lie (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2021 (UTC),

No worries Loyalty me lie, we are all constantly learning. Greyjoy ^talk 05:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Article

Thank you for advising. I've added several citations and updated his career info. Then balanced the information concerning the public feud (citations included) which was heavily biased in favour of one party. Appreciate your help!

Category edit reversion

Hi Greyjoy,

This is in response to your reversion of my edit, as can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hana_Kimura&oldid=prev&diff=1024804439

In response to your edit reason ("Categories should reflect what is included in the article, feel free to add a reference to the article supporting this claim"):

It is currently reflected in the article. The cause of death is listed as hydrogen sulfide, and that is cited in the article. I am not reverting your edit atm as I don't want to risk starting an edit war. I'm curious about your reasoning. Perhaps you missed that the cause of death and citation? :) --Karlshammar (talk) 01:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Karlshammar, thanks for the message. I don't know how I missed that! I have self-reverted, thanks for being so good about this. Greyjoy ^talk 02:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

No worries, Greyjoy - stuff happens! Thank you for being good about this as well. :)

PS. As an ASOIAF fan I wholeheartedly approve of your name. :D --Karlshammar (talk) 13:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Mario Escudero biography

Someone changed references to Mario Escudero to Valero, but that is wrong. If that was you, could you please change it back. Maybe it is confusing because I put is second last name in there, but he is not Valero, but Escudero if you want to just use his last name. Thanks for your help BTW. I´m struggling with this...--Mariomescudero (talk) 08:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Mariomescudero no worries, have corrected the surname through the article. Greyjoy ^talk 08:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank u for your last edit and removing the names I put as references. I will try to find the few others in which I did a similar thing and put it back as text in the article. My apologies.--Mariomescudero (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Ed Gein - list of songs about serial killers

I'm not sure how you're defining "serial killer" if Ed Gein isn't one. Even if we insist on making that distinction, it seems ridiculous to leave him out of this list. I don't think the article should try to clarify that difference, unless there's going to be a separate article called "list of songs about murderers who are not serial killers". Anyone who comes to the original list is not going to care about, say, Ricky Kasso not being a technical serial killer; they're instead going to wonder why the extant songs about him aren't mentioned. I propose that we recategorize and rename the list to simply "List Of Songs About Murderers", or something similar.

Tattered&Torn (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Tattered&Torn, a serial killer is usually defined as a person who murders 3+ people over a period of > 30 days. Any proposed changes to the article can be made at the article's talk page. Greyjoy ^talk 22:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi nice to meet you names Marc James Weber

Hi nice to meet you my name is Marc James Weber. Btw I’m actually kinda new to editing wikia and Wikipedia. But I’m learning and I’m willing to learn too as well :) Marcjamesweber1996 (talk) 22:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Nice to meet you Marcjamesweber1996, if you have any editing questions feel free to message me here. Greyjoy ^talk 22:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok understood :) Marcjamesweber1996 (talk) 22:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Mario Escudero‎

Hi, I noticed you reverted all the COI additions to the article. I did the same thing (yesterday?), but then I realized that the article before the COI edits has a huge amount of material, pretty much all unsourced, whereas the COI edits, even though they may be inappropriate, had a fair number of sources, so I restored the COI edits. The reality is that what needs to be done is take the COI version as the base and then edit it so that it's a decent article. I know I'm not interested in doing that, but perhaps you are? I can see that you create a lot of content, so... --Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

You have a good point, I have reverted my edit. I have to admit that I am also not super keen to take on this task at the moment, but will keep an eye on it for the future. Greyjoy ^talk 21:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

I understand. Being an idiot, I started trimming it. An absolute nightmare. I stopped after I destroyed god knows how many named refs. I believe a bot will come along and recover the ones I deleted. Hope so because I'm not gonna do it. Once that happens, if it happens, I'll go back because it's still a mess.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

ShimsCabot - use of image

Hi, thank you for pointing out the copyright issue on the image - I was given the image to use by Patrick McGuire and used it without investigating the creator. I will be rectifying this issue very shortly. I hope this is a suitable course of action and will be happy to take your guidance. ShimsCabot (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know ShimsCabot, what is your connection to Thompsons Solicitors Scotland? Greyjoy ^talk 08:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

I work for a (very small) media agency producing news snippets and articles for various firms, one of which is Thompsons - they must like my style of writing because they asked me to create some new content for them - the Patrick McGuire page was already live. I am paid by my agency, so while I accept there is a COI, I am not paid directly by Thompsons... but they do like my writing, so Woo Hoo. I have tried to get a User Page published ShimsCabot but so far have not had any luck - do you have any advice? ShimsCabot (talk) 08:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

ShimsCabot, I am going to leave a template on your talk page about COI and paid editing. Greyjoy ^talk 08:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you ShimsCabot (talk) 08:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Greyjoy, The image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrick_McGuire_4745.jpg now has the appropriate permissions from Paul Hunter, the owner/creator of the work. I'm guessing I will need to request that the image be added to Patrick McGuire's page on his Talk Page, if this is correct is there a specific template I should use? Many thanks for any assistance you can give. ShimsCabot (talk) 08:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ShimsCabot, all the details about requesting edits can be found here. I believe Template:Request edit is the correct choice for COI additions. Greyjoy ^talk 08:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. ShimsCabot (talk) 09:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Help

Protect rudra thandavam because of vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.46.71.131 (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Rudra tandavam

Why would someone add controversial content in information about a movie, Which can spread religious and political disharmony? Thats why i deleted that propaganda information from wiki page. Don't make it a warzone for different political, religious and castist groups. Let it be an information page instead of a controversy creater HardikDodia (talk) 08:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

HardikDodia, Wikipedia is not censored and the information appears to be properly referenced. If you have an issue with the inclusion you can discuss on the article's talk page. Greyjoy ^talk 08:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Make it a well managed and censored platform instead of a comment section on social media where anybody can dump any misinformation on Wikipedia. If it is harmful for our social integrity and harmony, we can remove it. This article can cause threat to our society HardikDodia (talk) 08:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

No HardikDodia Wikipedia is not, and will not be censored. Additions are supported with reliable sources, not "anybody can dump any misinformation". If there is a specific source you have a concern with you can take that to the article's talk page. Greyjoy ^talk 08:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

One guy from youtube told his followers to edit the page and delete all criticism. That is reason. This guy also commented there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLMaoIykA_w&lc=UgyaCzDu_20HDsz70ut4AaABAg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.46.66.167 (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2021 (UTC) One of the extended users User:Venkat TL is abusing his editing privilege to remove multiple sections from that page. Please restore all those texts and ask that editor not to remove content without proper discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4040:E8D:D002:1458:11F6:E1DE:F689 (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

The editor has provided justification for his removals, if you disagree you can discuss it with them or on the article's talk page. Greyjoy ^talk 00:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Natalie Mars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalie Mars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Mars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)