User talk:HJawad

Welcome!

Hello, HJawad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SEAT 131/Toledo

Hello HJawad, I am afraid that calling the Toledo the successor of the 131 is simply your opinion, rather than a verifiable fact. As a matter of fact, the text currently states that the Malaga replaced the 131, so your edit is also in conflict with the remainder of the article. You should be aware that any content added to WP must be sourced, if you need any help with (the rather complicated) referencing system, please feel free to ask. But also, do stop making unreferenced edits. Cheers and welcome, ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C3 Picasso

Hi, please don't split paragraphs, it's unhelpful, unconstructive, and there's already an open discussion about it on the page talk page. If it's done again by you with no discussion it will be considered edit warring so bring it to the talk page first. Thanks Jenova20 10:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Audi RS 4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sedan

SEAT León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Estate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C3 Picasso Again

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Keep it up, you'll just get blocked. TAKE IT TO THE TALK PAGE or begin discussions here. DO NOT edit war! It is an instant block Please listen this time. Jenova20 17:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Welcome to Wikipedia. You seem to be on the right track with your edits, however when edit of yours gets reverted, it's generally a good idea to discuss it on the talk page rather than reverting/undoing that person's edit. That constitutes an edit war. I've noticed that you've done this a few times already, and have yet to make a single talk page edit. Please keep it in mind in the future. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to several articles

Your recent editing history at Compact executive car shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. CZmarlin (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Compact executive car

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Edit warring and abuse of multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:HJawad reported by User:CZmarlin (Result: 1 week). EdJohnston (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverts

Why you keep reverting those certain articles, when many people have told you the reasons they are not good edits? you keep to be blocked constatly, by violations of 3RR or by socketpuppeting, you have used around 10 different IPs so far. -->Typ932 ^T·C 12:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:43, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Compact executive car, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. >Typ932 ^T·C 16:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HJawad for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]