User talk:Hans3778

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 2010. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --Bobby122 (talk) 03:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Hans3778. I saw you on the Preadolescence article, then followed you to the Adult Swim article when checking to see how long you have been here at Wikipedia. Since you are new here, I give you this list in order to help your editing at this site:

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, which summarizes what belongs in Wikipedia and what does not;
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, which describes Wikipedia's mandatory core approach to neutral, unbiased article-writing;
Wikipedia:No original research, which prohibits the use of Wikipedia to publish personal views and original research of editors and defines Wikipedia's role as an encyclopedia of existing recognized knowledge;
Wikipedia:Verifiability, which explains that it must be possible for readers to verify all content against credible external sources (following the guidance in the Wikipedia:Risk disclaimer that is linked-to at the bottom of every article);
Wikipedia:Reliable sources, which explains what factors determine whether a source is acceptable;
Wikipedia:Citing sources, which describes the manner of citing sources so that readers can verify content for themselves; and
Wikipedia:Manual of Style, which offers a style guide—in general editors tend to acquire knowledge of appropriate writing styles and detailed formatting over time.

These are often abbreviated to WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:MOS respectively.

Also, you need to always sign your comments when "talking" on Wikipedia talk pages. To sign your comments, all you have to do is type four tildes (~~~~) beside them.

Take care, and welcome to Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 in fashion

A tag has been placed on 2010 in fashion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. badmachine (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1950s retro movement

A tag has been placed on 1950s retro movement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 16:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Nudity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Raptor ^{Let's talk}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 04:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010s fads and trends

The article 2010s fads and trends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 00:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Your first article

I have removed the words in bold which you added to the first sentence of "Things to avoid":

Articles about yourself (unless you are some notable person), your friends, your website, a band you're in (unless the band you are in is signed in some record company), your teacher, a word you made up, or a story you wrote

Even if people or bands are notable, under the WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest guidelines we don't want them writing about themselves - and, of course, many non-notable people think they are notable. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Generation Y

Please do NOT change the dates on the generation pages backed up by sources. You have changed a date on the Generation Y page that is sourced. The Ad Age article has a reference that has been checked. Thank you. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 04:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]