User talk:Hansi Choudhary

Hansi Choudhary, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hansi Choudhary! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

How do I create page without the risk of deletion Hansi Choudhary (talk) 19:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Abhimanyu Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Indian and Star One

Alyy Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Star One

Gaurav Chopra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Star One

Suhasi Dhami (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Star One

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DPL bot, On your advice, I had removed disambiguation links from the above articles. Hansi Choudhary (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peechha Karo (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peechha Karo (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peechha Karo (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — GargAvinash ^talk 22:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Hansi Choudhary! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article on famous television series, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kamaal Hai Kamaal

The article Kamaal Hai Kamaal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - the only source is a youtube video of the show itself? Needs several secondary reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravensfire (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hansi jat. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 07:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]