User talk:Harmanjatt 00

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Harmanjatt 00! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Yungli0n (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Yungli0n (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)yungli0n[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mali caste—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jat Regiment, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sikh Regiment, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sikh Regiment. SunDawn (talk) 14:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Baj Singh, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey , i want to tell you the sources used on baaj singh was very poor sources they are not truthfull that's why I added the trusted sources Harmanjatt 00 (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added the reliable sources on sikh regiment page. I donot know why are blocked me . I added every possible sources and link , refeences Harmanjatt 00 (talk) 22:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sikh Regiment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 21:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also notice that some of your edits are copyright violations (for e.g., this one contains text copied from [1]). Please be extra careful when you return after the block ends. --RegentsPark (comment) 23:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. RegentsPark (comment) 00:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Guru Hargobind. - Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Guru Hargobind. - Arjayay (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at President's Bodyguard. jp×g 03:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I provide the relable sources on the page of Shri guru hargobind sahib ji even in school of india there is Punjabi book in which wriiten of 52 raja of gwalior who have been imprisoned by guru hargobind sahib ji Harmanjatt 00 (talk) 08:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is book BHAGAT RATAN WALA written in 17 century at the time of guru hargobind singh ji which tell the shastar vidya teacher of Shri gur hargobind singh ji was bhai jaita ji and bhai sigar ji Harmanjatt 00 (talk) 08:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 09:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]