User talk:Headstrong 345

Welcome!

Hello, Headstrong 345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 23:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Anne-hathaway-blue.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anne-hathaway-blue.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

DisneyMania 7

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article DisneyMania 7, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 202.144.182.152 14:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halloweentown

"Halloweentown 5 will be the follow up and it will be called..." Elementary school language arts lesson given again - pronouns and the like refer to the thing (in the case of a pronoun, a noun) immediately preceeding it. BUT, when that above quote is the first sentence, we have no idea what it will be a follow up to so can you please clarify that? Thanks. 172.129.149.83 11:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Halloweentwn+5:+She's+the+Witch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 02:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Ups and Downs. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. → AA ^(talk) — 10:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Talk:High School Musical 2, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 14:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Girolamo Savonarola 03:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to High School Musical 3, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. NrDg 16:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Your unexplained removals of text from the Dumbledore archive 7 are unacceptable. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once it's placed in an archive it isn't yours anymore. Moreover, you removed FaithlessWonderboy's post as well, and that's a pretty big bozo no-no. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 04:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I did not call you a bozo; I referred to your actions as being a "bozo no-no". Please feel free to Google that term, which refers to a famous saying from an American TV show called Bozo's Flying Circus that was syndicated worldwide; I am sorry if you aren't familiar with either the program or the phrase. Understand that it did not refer to you.

As for accusing you of vandalism, one only needs to look at the long list of other warnings you've received for blanking other information. Where there is smoke, there is usually fire. You have been on Wikipedia long enough to know what the rules are and how to correct your mistakes. Yes, people make mistakes,a nd yes, it is slightly possible that you did as well. I would ask that you prove it by going 60 days without edit-warring or removing text from an article, and you will have my support.

Lastly, I would point out something that Essjay (another editor from WP who has since left the project): Think about what you are editing. Ask yourself, 'does this edit improve the encyclopedia for everyone?' If your answer is ever 'no', don't do it. If you try to follow that as a guiding principle, you will find that you don't need toretract your words as often, and you won't have to worry about people being angry with your edits. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 04:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you luck on your 60 days. If you run into problems, drop me a line and I will get back to you and offer advice and/or help. As for admins, the first place to look is at WP:ADMIN, depending on why you need one. A full list of admins can be found at WP:LA. Something you might be interested in is having someone mentor you, if you are serious about being the best editor you can be for precisely no money per day, head on over to WP:MENTOR. that shoudl fix you up right nicely. Bon voyagé! :) - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 03:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The President's Daughters

Hello, you inquired about the authenticity of The President's Daughters on the film article's talk page back in August. I thought you'd like to know that I've nominated the article for deletion based on the notability guidelines for future films. Cheers! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Amanda Bynes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The phrase "It has been rumored ..." should not be used in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a tabloid or outlet for the rumor mill. Ward3001 (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Disneymania 6.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Disneymania 6.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DisneyMania 6

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the DisneyMania 6 article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Village pump".

- Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mamma Mia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mamma Mia.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Mamma Mia! (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 03:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]