User talk:Hgrobe

Welcome!

Hello, Hgrobe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 23:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sea_salt-e_hg.png

Hi Hgrobe. I noticed that you recently added the image Image:Sea_salt-e_hg.png to the salt article. It looks like a great graphic; however, I noticed that the largest component of the box at the left is labeled "chlorine". I think the box should be relabeled to "chloride" (with a "d") to reflect the fact that it is the ionic form. I would change it myself, but I am not that familiar with using/editing .png images. Thanks!--GregRM 21:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GregRN, your advice to a german always having problems with those 'english chemicals' is very much appreciated. thank you. i will change it as soon as possible. Hgrobe 19:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good now. Thanks!--GregRM 22:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to thank you ! Hgrobe 20:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ADEPD

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ADEPD, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wdc-mare.org/projects/adepd.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you really are the owner of this site, please place a notice on the website releasing it under a license acceptble to Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the html source text of the original page I am recorded as author: <meta name="Author" content="Hannes Grobe, Rainer Sieger" />. So where is the problem? Hannes Grobe (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ADEPD

A tag has been placed on ADEPD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ank329 (talk) 06:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MTP-II MATER

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of MTP-II MATER, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://cordis.europa.eu/data/MSS_PROJ_FP4_ES_ES/ACTIONeqDndSESSIONeq4607200595ndDOCeq6ndTBLeqEN_PROJ.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Faraday's law picture

The image you just added to Faraday's law is great. I think it might be even better if it had a more specific description, saying what is inside the tube that rotates when you turn the handle, what the things are on top, etc. Assuming of course, that you know these details! If not, that's fine. --Steve (talk) 23:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your remark Steve (you mean in Faraday's_law_of_induction?). i will try hard to do so. Hannes Grobe (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant Faraday's law of induction. :-) --Steve (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Successful featured picture nomination

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Desiccation-cracks hg.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\^talk 13:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Maedin\^talk 13:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Hannes,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Desiccation-cracks hg.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 23, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-06-23. howcheng {chat} 16:36, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thats fine, thank you Hannes Grobe (talk) 16:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CINCS

The article CINCS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ephemeral project. No independent sources about the project, no indication of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 18:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KEYCOP

The article KEYCOP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic project. References are a field of dead links, but neither of the living ones mention the project

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MTP-II MATER for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MTP-II MATER is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTP-II MATER until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the link to cordis for this project, given in the deletion request above does not work. this is the perfect example that links pointing to somewhere on the web, are not reliable. some years ago, i have started to open lemmata of EU-research projects. all were deleted, MATER is the last remain. this ends up in a discussion about the relevance of research projects. the related article in wikipedia says, that a project must be large to be relevant to wikipedia. hard to find the propper definition of "large" for a research project - where is the limit in euro or man power or topics between relevant and not relevant. i am an inclusionist and i am wondering, why there is a limitation for research projects producing new knowledge for mankind. the eu spends billions of euro for its international reasearch and interesting findings are beeing published every year. tiresome discussions. Hannes Grobe (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hgrobe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hgrobe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hgrobe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]