Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GiantSnowman 20:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Happened to see your comments to Adville. Very good ! If you like keep an eye on him, for instance at the talk-page for Swedish Wikipedia. He and Dmn simply think the can lording around here , as if it was swWIKI. Anyways thanks ! Boeing720 (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boeing720 I must admit finding them blatantly dishonest in their discussions. "Dnm" who loves ad-hominem, then claims others are attacking him with ad-hominem. Bizarre! "Adville" who gladly accepts any faulty argument as long as it supports his opinion. Both gladly lies just to "win" a discussion. Crazy! Hmc1282171021 (talk) 08:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Very well put, Hmc128.. ! And if they loose an argument, they can well go for something else. As they are used to. They are both admins at Swedish Wiki, who arrived here (with less than 500 edits here, as of a week ago or so) with some kind of task, which includes a vendetta aimed at contributor both there and here. I'm not really certain of its reasons, but you have observed their behavior. In my opinion they are around average admins (there are in my experience worse) at my My native language Wiki. I "began" there around 2009, and there many admins both have and use power, "lording" is a suitable verb for far too many of them. I couldn't write about anything related to Southern Sweden, Denmark or any other "non-approved" subject. That Wiki stands in sharp contrast not only to this wiki, but also to the Danish one. However I'm hoping for peace now, and that they will "cool off" here now. (Preferably return to where they came from) But if you ever happen to note similar behavior from any of them ever again here, you are very welcome to alert me. Cheers ! Boeing720 (talk) 09:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Dnm isn't an admin, but the way people listen to him he doesn't need to be. But yes, the Swedish wiki is very weird. Sometimes their dishonesty leaves me speechless. I'm used – from Twitter – to be very careful with what I write. Using logical fallacies is a good way to lose a lot of credibility on Twitter. But on sv wikipedia pointing out fallacies and stressing logic and facts is a good way to be branded a "troublemaker" and get permanently banned. I also note that their interpretation of 'meritocracy' isn't the one in the encyclopedia. Hmc1282171021 (talk) 22:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Odin (programming language), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 12:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
