User talk:Horikawa~enwiki

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1935 Xinzhu-Taizhong earthquake, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 1935 Xinzhu-Taizhong earthquake was changed by Horikawa (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-08-12T07:48:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page 1946 Xinhua earthquake. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pmlineditor  Talk 08:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did to 1946 Xinhua earthquake. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 08:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Seb az86556 (talk)

Discuss re-directs with other editors. Un-doing them is quite a pain. Seb az86556 (talk) 08:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to 1941 Zhongpu earthquake. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pmlineditor  Talk 08:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Do not create double-redirects, and such... I'm losing track un-doing them Seb az86556 (talk) 08:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to 1941 Zhongpu earthquake. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Seb az86556 (talk) 08:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

!

You cannot go around doing this w/o consultation from other editors. You are creating double redirects, red links, and cyclic loops. Discuss these changes with editors knowledgeable of Chinese Pinyin transcription before making any further changes. You just messed with a template. That could have gotten you blocked. Please simply stop and discuss it on the relevant talkpages Seb az86556 (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Horikawa~enwiki. You have new messages at Pmlinediter's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Pmlineditor  Talk 08:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Names of places in Taiwan

The national government has mandated Hanyu Pinyin as the official system of romanisation in the Republic of China.[1] What the local governments say is not important, because they do not make the rules on this issue - central government does. As an example take the city of 中和 - the central government now uses "Zhonghe". Signs in the city itself use Zhonghe, Junghe, Jhonghe, Chung-ho and Jungher. Who should we trust? It has to be the organisation which has legal force in this argument - central government.

Taiwantaffy (talk) 09:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Notes

I've posted threads on each articles talk pages of the articles you moved. [2][3][4] Pmlineditor  Talk 09:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Pinyin in Taiwan

If that's a way, use Taibei to replace Taipei???, and most important that it is a event happened in 1935, not 2009. or if you find document uses classcal placename, e.g. Canton, Peking, Fuchien, Nanking .etc, and we won't know what placename is.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JustbeBPMF (talk • contribs) 14:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC) JustbeBPMF (talk) 14:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Images

File:Exquisite-folder pictures.png

Hi Horikawa, you can find many images available to use on Wikipedia already uploaded by other contributors on Wikimedia Commons. The best way of uploading your own image or video is to go to Commons:Upload and follow the instructions. Uploaded files must be public domain or creative commons with attribution, see the upload page for links to detailed explanations of what these terms mean. Once uploaded to Commons, images can be shown in Wikipedia and any of the sister projects in the normal way (see Wikipedia:Picture tutorial).

Additional points to note...

Logging in - you have to have an account on Commons, this may have already been created under the same name and password as your Wikipedia account, see Special:MergeAccount. Copyright - if the copyright of the photo is owned by someone else and there is no existing free license to reference (for example on their website), then you need to follow the Commons:OTRS process and confidentially supply an email from the copyright holder. If you think your photo is public domain but want to check the rules that apply then see WP:RFCA and List of countries' copyright length. Email a photo - see Wikipedia:Contact us/Photo submission. You should note that there may be a long backlog and your email may take days or weeks before getting processed. If you seem technically able, you may get a polite request to do it yourself as this is a low priority for the OTRS volunteers. EXIF data - image data may be automatically added by the camera or by your photo processing applications. This will be visible after upload so make sure you are happy that the make of camera, when/where it was taken etc. will be consistent with your upload information. Image verification - the photo can be checked using TinEye after upload, so if it appears on websites which claim 'All rights reserved' or similar then it may get marked for deletion.

A simple standard guide is at Help:Files. If you need more help on getting a suitable photo in the first place, you may find Finding images tutorial helpful. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diana Prince (pornographic actress)

The article Diana Prince (pornographic actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability. Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent, reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Diana Prince (pornographic actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Prince (pornographic actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Prince (pornographic actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Horikawa. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Horikawa~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

13:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)