Jump to content

User talk:HouseBlaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page!
Note: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave me a message here, I will respond to it here as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. Unless you request otherwise, I will ping you so that you know I have responded. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.

Thank you!

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Okay Amogelang22 (talk) 11:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Eisenheim10 (07:31, 27 October 2024)

[edit]

Hello HouseBlaster, i’m here to learn new things, thank you for being my mentor. --Eisenheim10 (talk) 07:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eisenheim10! Let me know if you need any help, and I will be more than happy to assist :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, HouseBlaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of video games with AI-versus-AI modes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Aneesjameel on Wikipedia:U (18:32, 30 October 2024)

[edit]
--Aneesjameel (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aneesjameel! Do you have any questions about editing Wikipedia? HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Amogelang22 (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damning info

[edit]
Hello, HouseBlaster. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HistoryofIran (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you sent me a second email, I responded earlier, HistoryofIran. Still am not planning to take action until the matter is resolved. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 22:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ops, it went under spam, my bad. Bit ironic since I used to advise loads of customers to be aware of that during my time in customer service. Best. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories to be merged

[edit]

Regarding this Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_October_17#Category:Ugandan_dermatologists. Who actually merges the cats (and deletes the old cats)? LibStar (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LibStar! It appears I forgot to list that discussion at WP:CFDW. I will do so now. Thanks for the reminder :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. LibStar (talk) 23:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome HouseBlaster! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Min968_unban_request. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Kristi Rock (16:02, 2 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello there! I am trying to write an article or bio about a family friend and I am a little confused. I start the page on my user page correct under write an article where the cursor blinks? It tells you to start in "the box", is this the box? Then it tells me to name in article and makes it sound as if I am suppose to change my user name? Any help is greatly appreciated. --Kristi Rock (talk) 16:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page is located at User:Kristi Rock, not User:Joseph Lee Lambert. However, because this person is a family friend, you have a conflict of interest. You need to follow the steps to disclose your conflict of interest. And, if we are being honest, most editors (myself included) would recommend that you find something else to edit about. Conflict of interest editing is a very big problem on Wikipedia, and we spend untold hours cleaning up after such editors. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Question from Lokpali (18:26, 3 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello,

When will the pages I created be patrolled? I created many pages but only 1 is patrolled. --Lokpali (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lokpali! There is a very large backlog of pages needing to be patrolled; there is no specific order in which pages are reviewed. You can read more about the process at WP:NPP, but many articles take months to get reviewed. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from HomelessProphet1929 (04:17, 4 November 2024)

[edit]

How do I add an info box, like the ones in the articles for countries? Thanks. --HomelessProphet1929 (talk) 04:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HomelessProphet1929: using the visual editor, you can follow the directions at Help:VisualEditor#Editing templates (infoboxes are templates). Let me know if you need help choosing which infobox template to use! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, HouseBlaster,

I was going to tag this category CSD C1 but, within seconds, you filled it with articles. How did you categorize these articles so fast? I assume you used some editing tool or was it a template you used? Always curious on how to edit more efficiently. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz! I used Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot to facilitate the move from Category:Force-feeding to the people category. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 02:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, HouseBlaster. I've looked at Cat-a-lot several times over the years I've been editing but I found it too complicated to jump into. But I assume that this is also how some CFD closures are handled that aren't handled by a bot? Maybe I'll spend the time this week trying to figure it out. I've never gotten the hang of AWB either. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is how I do most CFD closes which do not need the bot (usually because you only need to merge some entries). I found it fairly easy to learn; the documentation at Commons is really helpful. It can be a little buggy at times (it was built to handle files), but it gets the job done the vast majority of the time. I am happy to help with questions if you have them :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 03:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1796 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]

I've contributed to tagging a lot of buildings into the demolition category on the understanding they were deliberately demolished. I completely disagree with the consensus that was reached at that discussion, but now it's closed, I'm one user and am unable to overturn it on my own. My suggestion would be to have a category for buildings that were demolished and another for buildings that were destroyed. I only noticed because of my watch list.

What do you recommend here? Could I start a new CfD? SportingFlyer T·C 05:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SportingFlyer! The consensus in the discussion was that this tree should mirror Category:Buildings and structures by year of completion, and contain buildings destroyed by any cause whatsoever, including demolition. Your options include a fresh CFD (User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD is very helpful for mass nominations), though I would warn that the participants in the old discussion see the rescoping as a feature, not a bug. You could also create a new subcategory of the destroyed categories for intentional demolition, though I would consider self-CFDing one or two of those categories to ensure there is consensus for their existence before creating a massive tree. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did voice my displeasure on the page outside the closed discussion and someone else agreed with me. The problem is we just renamed a bunch of categories where every building would have been "demolished" but not "destroyed," so the "correct" thing to do would have been to rename the top category and then create a new set of subcats like we have for building collapses. I'm really frustrated by this sadly, though that has nothing to do with you! SportingFlyer T·C 16:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have filed Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction. I will tag all of the subcategories for you :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is going on here? Is this just a reversion of the Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 29#Category:Buildings and structures by year of demolition closure? Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SportingFlyer has filed a fresh CFD to reverse the already-closed CFD. Nothing has been reverted yet. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin November Issue 1

[edit]


MediaWiki message delivery 22:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical Loop Technologies

[edit]

Hey,

I know the discussion was archived at a non-consensus. I was going back through the Project page and came across it again. After re-reading the inputs from @DMacks , specifically, I took another look at the articles in question. While I agree with DMacks that it would be more akin to a separations process on re-review (compared to my original assesment), it is still not a great descriptor, as DMacks point it out as well, because its not the exact same function as a adsorpition bed.

I went out and looked elsewhere to see if I could find anything regarding the topic name, which seems to be big in academic circles regarding Carbon Capture. I landed upon this article from the Royal Chem Society, with this specific quote:

"Although the term “chemical looping” was first minted by Richter and Knoche in 1983 in the context of reducing exergy loss in fossil fuel combustion,1 the concept of chemical looping (CL), i.e. decomposition of a chemical reaction into multiple sub-reactions facilitated by solid reaction intermediates, was investigated long before that. Owing to the pressing demand for carbon emissions reduction,4,5 chemical looping combustion (CLC) has been studied extensively over the past three decades as a new technology for power generation with integrated CO2 capture,6–22 as evidenced by more than 2400 peer-reviewed publications to date (based on the chemical abstracts service)."

From this, I think Im personally going back towards Category:Chemical processes for both things, but would rather see something related to carbon capture, environmental process, etc. to better describe it. As I said before, these specific topics seem to be very geared towards carbon capture and maximizing chemical process energy so little goes to waste in terms of energy, while also being a source of carbon capture.

I would really also like @DMacks input on this as a professor/academic of Chemistry regarding the literal reaction part of both CLC and CLR ChemicalBear (talk) 21:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChemicalBear! I am going to be very honest and say that I do not understand what you are saying (almost certainly due to my complete lack of formal training in chemistry!). Would you like the CFD to be reopened? If so, I would recommend filing a new CFD instead and pinging the previous participants. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 21:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I've reopened the topic in a new CFD here. I appreciate your honesty, I was just reaching out because you were last point-of-contact from that discussion! ChemicalBear (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Amogelang22 on User talk:Amogelang22 (10:34, 9 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello Can i ask How can create an article based on my culture --Amogelang22 (talk) 10:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So who deleted it and why Amogelang22 (talk) 11:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any deleted contributions on this account – did you have a different one? Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i heard someone saying that the account contribution has been deleted Amogelang22 (talk) 15:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that good news is that has not happened! Nothing has been deleted. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okaythats good Amogelang22 (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
can I ask you a question Amogelang22 (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! HouseBlaster (he/they) 15:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
why people are abusive to us as their fellow community members Amogelang22 (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
how did you start being a Wikimedia member Amogelang22 (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can read about my start at Wikipedia at User:Clovermoss/Editor reflections/1–100#User:HouseBlaster – December 2, 2023 :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biography of yourself

[edit]

tell us about your self Life Amogelang22 (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Amogelang22 on User talk:HouseBlaster (16:01, 9 November 2024)

[edit]

Can you help me with publishing My first story that I wrote 5 months ago --Amogelang22 (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot. This is an encyclopedia, not a place for stories. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Good baker on Top Chef Canada season 11 (16:36, 9 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello who do I edit and make episode title cards --Good baker (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Good baker, and welcome to Wikipedia! You can edit whatever topics you like (as long as you do not have a conflict of interest with them). I am not sure what you mean by episode title cards. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You know how you make a new page for a new season of a show and there’s an episode part that you edit and make the title cards so I’m wondering how do you do that Good baker (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you referring to the box at the right of the article which summarizes key information? I admit I do not regularly edit TV articles, but if you want to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television they might be better able to assist you (WikiProjects are groups of editors who work on specific groups of articles – in this case, TV). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Siraj Aizlewood (19:09, 9 November 2024)

[edit]

Hi HouseBlaster didn't realise I'd get a mentor that's amazing, thank you.

I have an article I'd like to publish, but can see that the Contribute button is greyed out. I guess I have to "level-up" first?

Any chance i could send the article to you, and you could give me some pointers?

All the best,

Siraj --Siraj Aizlewood (talk) 19:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To publish an article directly, you need to be "autoconfirmed" (which requires 4 days experience and 10 edits). You can use the article wizard to submit a draft before you are autoconfirmed. Once you have created your draft, I would be happy to give you some pointers. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query

[edit]

Hello, HouseBlaster,

There were some speedy category renames yesterday (from U.S. Presidents categories to United States Presidents categories) and User:JJMC89 bot III should have recategorized all of the talk pages on Nov. 8th but it still hasn't and it's almost been 24 hours since the categories were moved. See Category:B-Class U.S. Presidents articles as an example.

Does it usually take this long or did something happen with the bot? Because all of the United States Presidents articles categories are empty right now. In the past, I've brought this question to the bot operator but they say that they created the bot but do not control how it is utilized with CFD requests. Just hoping you can make some magic edit to resolve this or tell me that I should give the bot more time to do its work. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz! Those categories are all populated by a template, which the bot cannot fix. (The bot is being updated soon to do this automatically, and I am very excited!) I made some updates to {{WikiProject United States}}, which will automatically fix the issue once the jobqueue catches up. Thank you for pointing this out :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 21:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]