User talk:Hstudent
Welcome!
Hello, Hstudent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -SpuriousQ (talk) 08:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Eno Eruotor for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eno Eruotor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eno Eruotor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Kaye Forster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There need to be independent, reliable references about her and none are in the article. BBC sources can be used to provide refs about her job, but cannot be used to determine notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hstudent. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 21:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
Replaceable fair use File:Knutsford Station 2015.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Knutsford Station 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Hstudent. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hstudent. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Northern
[edit]Firstly, your accusation that I "am working to improve Northern's PR" is nonsense. If you actually look at my edits on the Northern page you will notice they have been overwhelmingly negative in regards to increased cancellations, industrial action, botched timetable changes and delays of new rolling stock into service. This reflects the mood of the franchises as reported in media outlets, both national and local. Where applicable, I have sought to include a degree of balance with the odd opportunity to include Northern responses to meet WP:NPOV, for instance including new rolling stock investments but also reported criticisms in the introduction.
Secondly, there does not need to be an entire paragraph discussing Northern's inability to introduce a half-hourly service on the mid-Cheshire line. Dedicating sentences to specific train services is complete overkill: "For example, the 15:02 Chester to Manchester service is operated by 2 carriages instead of 4, now that Northern are using more carriages on the Buxton line to allow for an all day half-hourly service". Discussion of isolated services are not proportionate to their overall significance to the article topic under WP:PROPORTION.
I have amended the page by reducing the small essay that existed previously and which was out of kilter with the rest of the article. I have also excluded the claims about reduced carriage capacity being reduced as there is no verifiable reference to support this. Stevo1000 (talk) 21:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of Reba Maybury
[edit]Hello Hstudent,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Reba Maybury for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
John B123 (talk) 17:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement
[edit]I can see that you are an infrequent editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Reba Maybury. I see that you have removed the infringing text, for which, thank you. The material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reba Maybury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for January 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The One with All the Thanksgivings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
[edit]Your edit to Northern Trains has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]November 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Mattdaviesfsic. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 230, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Mattdaviesfsic The information about the 230s having lower 60mph top speed and having a short 18m carriage length is already on the page. The carriage length, in the fact box, isn't referenced. Consequently I've added the necessary citification required tag. The other information I referred to is already included on this and other Wiki pages and is referenced.
- I hope you aren't connected with Vivarail, as you don't seem happy with impartial information being posted, to make the article neutral. As you'll be aware the cost comparison table was produced by Vivarail so needs additional information alongside it to comply with Wiki guidelines.
- Your undoing of my edits as now left inaccurate information on the page regarding Arriva Rail North, which I will also go back and correct. Please be more careful in the future. Hstudent (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
"Definition" template
[edit]For future reference, the {{definition}}
template that you added to "pop-up metro" in the Class 230 article isn't intended for that purpose; it points to a section of the Manual of Style that advises against specific types of phrase that are inherently imprecise. For words and phrases that are simply unclear or not explained, templates like {{clarify}}
, {{explain}}
, or {{definition needed}}
are the ones to use. Cheers. XAM2175 (T) 21:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Topical Cream
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Topical Cream requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bulklana (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)