Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
East point academy
Just wondering the reasons behind the revert on East point academy.
IP user had made some changes that did not appear constructive to the article and I reverted. They reinserted and I advised thema bout BRD they have then just proceeded to continue with theier edits without attempting to gain consensus on the talk page.
Could you advise?
found a compromise, keeps all the old stuff in and sums up all recent events
Hi ICryOverSpiltMilk. I reverted your recent edit here, as I felt it did not seem helpful, and was not based on any WP:RS. This topic has been discussed before, so if you disagree, maybe you'd like to open a thread at the article Talk Page? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)