User talk:Imbored4593

August 2022

Hello, I'm Praxidicae. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. I don't know what you're doing with removing content with no explanation and adding clearly inappropriate categories, but please stop. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ku Klux Klan, you may be blocked from editing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't vandalize I Added the Nazi flag and CSA flag under symbols to show the flags that KKK uses Imbored4593 (talk) 18:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you did so without sources. But this doesn't address your other improper edits. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

added portal of countries of people who where from that country because they were missing Imbored4593 (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also added a warning on articles with sexual themes so little children don't read theme and because they may be graphic for some readers Imbored4593 (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTCENSORED. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ProScan Survey. ... discospinster _talk 20:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the page should be a candidate for deletion because of lack of sources poor grammar and biases info Imbored4593 (talk) 20:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed deletion of the page on your behalf. If it is declined by anyone, you can start a regular deletion discussion by following the instructions at WP:AfD. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61763

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imbored4593 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I'm new to Wikipedia, so I still am new to the rules

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.