User talk:Iqbalmugheri1

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mugheri.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Godimrm (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Mugheri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mugheri has been reverted.
Your edit here to Mugheri was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://mugheritribe.weebly.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mugheri may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mugheri article

Hello, though I understand you are very interested in this subject, please note:

You cannot use Wikipedia to promote your personal Mugheri website, or present research that is not published by serious academic journals or news media. We absolutely must stick to WP:Reliable sources.
When using WP:Wikilinks (the blue clickable links), please only wikilink the first use of a word. That is, if Sindh is linked in the first paragraph, it does not need to be linked again anywhere in the page. To do so makes for a very cluttered page, so I've fixed this.
Please check your work before saving: you have many, many errors wherein you fail to leave a space after a comma or period, for example. If you can do a basic WP:Copyedit and check for such errors, that would help.
Please note WP:Words to avoid: a neutral reference work does not describe people as "brave", "wonderful", "exemplary", etc. Those are subjective and emotional terms we must avoid. Wikipedia does not praise nor denigrate people or groups, it simply describes.
I have removed several sections for lack of WP:Sources, or failing to meet WP:Notability. If a given person is a "famous Mugheri", we absolutely must see evidence that their career has been written about and discussed in news media or academica. Otherwise, while there are undoubtedly many thousands of good and kind people of Mugheri heritage, it's simply not pertinent to the reader to list them out unless we have sourcing to back it up. Wikipedia does not present "new" ideas, we simply summarise existing published works into a convenient format.

I hope this helps explain my edits. Let me know if you have any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit protection request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Reason: User Raheem Jamali recently deleted about 20 percent data of my article so its my humble request to enable edit protection thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iqbalmugheri1 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 6 December 2013‎

Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop inserting yourself into articles.

Articles are not your personal playground to include information about yourself. You have been warned before. Please stop. Bgwhite (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iqbal Mugheri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iqbal Mugheri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bgwhite (talk) 01:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]