User talk:IsLioTr

IsLioTr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi IsLioTr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Hello IsLioTr, I was reading your request for confirmed status I noticed your mention regarding page protection I would like to semi-protect them to protect from vandalism, Pages are not protected preemptively, see WP:NO-PREEMPT. I'm just mentioning this so you don't send requests to WP:RPP without just cause for the protection. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 20:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mlpearc, thanks for the information, but I didn't mean it in the sense of pre-emptive protection, only that I had requested them but they have not yet been approved or denied, as well as other requests I plan to make about similar pages which suffer from vandalism.

Also, I ask that you, or whoever is responsible, please reconsider my request for a confirmed account, as my request was grossly misunderstood. Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed

Thanks for your attention. IsLioTr (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked from editing for continually signing admin-noticeboard reports with a false signature to avoid recognition. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. the panda ₯’ 22:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IsLioTr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Signature was accidental, caused by copying another entry (which I would then edit with my request) because I wanted to get the formatting right, but didn't realize the signature was still the same, and I corrected it immediately after. I in no way intended to conceal my identity, nor did I have any reason to do so.

Decline reason:

Failure to respond to concerns for two weeks. Miniapolis 00:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Accidental? You did it on AIV, and 3 times minimum on RFPP. the panda ₯’ 23:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all of those three on RFPP were made within the same edit, thus why they all have the same template, and all were corrected immediately after, as you can see in the revision log. I also fixed the time in the signature as that was the same too. The reason one of them was requested again (after yesterday) was because of new recent vandalism on that page. The one on AIV was also fixed immediately after.

Here are the logs edits for your reference:

RFPP: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&diff=618188105&oldid=618187854

AIV: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=618188015&oldid=618187662&xxAutoPagerimmedialate-load-count=3

Thanks. IsLioTr (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, you're saying that wassen.krm was your template on both pages? An account which has no edits? Origamite^{\(·_·\)(/·_·)/} 14:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And why would you use another user's entry when there are perfectly good templates at the top of the page, with tildes to sign your signature? Origamite^{\(·_·\)(/·_·)/} 14:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]