User talk:IskandarRoCkEt

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:EljanM per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EljanM. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IskandarRoCkEt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Mz7: Really? Who is EljanM? I have just checked his page, he is from Georgia. I have nothing to do with Georgia. This is a clear slander. Please check my IP adress. Are the IPs of the accounts you counted the same? There is no reason to block me. This's really sleander. You deleted my legend answers and evidences in Shusha talk page. Why are you blocking Azerbaijani users? You also blocked CuriousGolden and they trying to block Solavirum. HelloCaucasus was my brother's account. I didn't know that there must be 1 account per 1 IP. Sorry. You can block me for this mistake but not indefinitely. Indefinitely is really heavy penalty.

Decline reason:

Confirmed to HelloCaucasus. This has nothing to do with "1 account per 1 IP". Yamla (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IskandarRoCkEt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamla: Why you blocked me indefinitely? This is first time. I didn't know.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. i didn't block you and this isn't an unblock request. Please do not make multiple simultaneous requests. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Mz7: Come on guys. It was first time. My brother won't use HelloCaucasus. @Yamla: @Mz7: I didn't know. Please unblock me. It was first time. I have nothing to do with EljanM. I have no violations other than my brother opening a new account and supporting me. There is nothing negative in what I wrote on the Shusha Talk page. Please see my edit history. My brother won't use HelloCaucasus. Sincerely @Yamla: @Mz7: @Ymblanter: Guys. Do you see? Some users are adding armenian name to cities of Azerbaijan without reasons. Ganja, Nakhchivan. Please unblock me. There are no Azerbaijani users who will oppose it. IskandarRoCkEt (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla: @Mz7: @Ymblanter: Guys I am waiting your answers. IskandarRoCkEt (talk) 16:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IskandarRoCkEt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamla: @Mz7: Guys please read my unblock reason. Sincerely

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.. The standard offer is probably your best bet given the socking additional a month ago. Further misuse of your talk page while blocked will result in the loss of talk page access. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Please read my unblock reasons. I'm tired of waiting IskandarRoCkEt (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating new unblock requests while you already have one open, and stop pinging admins. SQL ^{Query me!} 18:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]