User talk:JC847966

This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(Fall_2021) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JC847966, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JC847966 I appreciate the scholarly review it was very inciteful and will use it as a reference to enhance the article. The peer review provided me with a lot of fluid ideas and look to incorporate those ideas into the article. Here are the edits that I considered making when revising my article: I took your advice and created an alternative view or the circumstance that is presented to these women to provide a neutral tone so that the audience may come to their own conclusions. So I added the decision that the women have to within my sandbox to choose between working at a standard bar or working for a tourist. In addition I looked to highlight particular questions that were presented within your review of the article such asAre the Dominican prostitutes hoping to travel back with the men out of the country?

I have added the fact that these women do look to marry these men in hope of a better lifestyle implying that they would do whatever it takes to secure that lifestyle.

Are these prostitutes specifically looking for foreign suitors, or is prostitution such a rampant problem in the DR that tourist prostitution is inevitable?

This question is tricky because as explained through the article its main focus is sex tourism implying that these women are looking to entertain foreign suitors. However, I did include how many Dominican women look down upon their men and praise European men. IT was great working on the article including your reviews it allowed for new ideas to flow and helped me add content to the article. Thank you and have a great evening GERSH.DGERSH.D (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowlegement of Peer Review

Please complete the assigned training modules. --TrudiJ (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JC847966 I appreciate the scholarly review it was very inciteful and will use it as a reference to enhance the article. The peer review provided me with a lot of fluid ideas and look to incorporate those ideas into the article. Here are the edits that I considered making when revising my article: I took your advice and created an alternative view or the circumstance that is presented to these women to provide a neutral tone so that the audience may come to their own conclusions. So I added the decision that the women have to within my sandbox to choose between working at a standard bar or working for a tourist. In addition I looked to highlight particular questions that were presented within your review of the article such asAre the Dominican prostitutes hoping to travel back with the men out of the country?

I have added the fact that these women do look to marry these men in hope of a better lifestyle implying that they would do whatever it takes to secure that lifestyle.

Are these prostitutes specifically looking for foreign suitors, or is prostitution such a rampant problem in the DR that tourist prostitution is inevitable?

This question is tricky because as explained through the article its main focus is sex tourism implying that these women are looking to entertain foreign suitors. However, I did include how many Dominican women look down upon their men and praise European men. IT was great working on the article including your reviews it allowed for new ideas to flow and helped me add content to the article. Thank you and have a great eveningGERSH.D (talk) 03:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)GERSH.D[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:GRIGOROPOULOS.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:GRIGOROPOULOS.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Sect of revolutionaries.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sect of revolutionaries.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:GRIGOROPOULOS.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GRIGOROPOULOS.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCI 110 peer review[edit]

Your article was very interesting to read about, on a topic that was newly exposed to me. Being so, it allowed me to see that I needed more background on the topic in order to fully understand. I would recommend that providing facts that relate to why the sect of revolutionaries complete the actions that they do? and why do people oppose or agree with them? who are their and who do they despise. I think answering the questions that relate to the ones I've mentioned will allow the reader to better fully understand the article that they are researching.

Otherwise the outline of your article was pleasant and it flowed very neatly. Keep up the great work and let me know if yo have any questions comments and concerns about my feedback. Thank you

-Taylor Capicchioni Taylor Capicchioni (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GRIGOROPOULOS.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GRIGOROPOULOS.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]