User talk:JHURULI

August 2013

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ellina Zvereva, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Ktr101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ellina Zvereva because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shahid Kapoor has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shahid Kapoor was changed by JHURULI (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957303 on 2014-02-24T18:11:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jhuruli

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jhuruli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. You have repeatedly removed content from pages, usually replacing it with content about yourself or your village, unrelated to the topic of the page, you have mad a ridiculous and unconstructive string of posts to a user's talk page, and you have not made any edits that contribute constructively to the encyclopaedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]