User talk:JJJJust

Welcome!

Hello, JJJJust, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 09:14, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Divboxing

Hey! I'm so pleased you found use for {{divbox}}. (deleted remainder of mistaken identity comment) — Xiong 熊 talk * 03:14, 2005 August 12 (UTC)

Welcome and Thank You

Thanks for introducing me to the wonderful world of editing on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, my school here is on an infinite ban for vandalism, so there is not much I can do while I am wasting my hours away at school. And by the way, 05:14, 4 August 2005 is the closest I can get to your account creation, which is when Longhair first welcomed you. JTFryman 21:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha, and, I made the account before that... I had just never posted anything before. I was too timid, and didn't know what I was doing then. JJJJust 19:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, JJJJust! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe 's talk 19:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Bapudi

Very neatly put on the Bapudi AFD. It seems to me that all the four (likely fewer) editors rallying to keep the article have done since the AFD was opened has been to muddy up the waters and try to confuse other editors about the article's subject. That they have been so ambiguous with it (the only external link in the article that even contains the word Bapudi refers to him/her as a music artist) only serves to further dig their case's grave. Not being able to decide if your cause of the day is a musician or a foundation or a film, or possibly an ancient religion with untranslated text isn't a healthy state to be in. :) --Kuzaar^-T-C- 03:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And, I bet the article is just going to be back up again.

Well if they do this time maybe the speedy will stick. *shrugs* This whole thing is getting to be as bad as some soap operas. BJK 16:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. Well, I've been trying to reasonably point out the flaws in what they've tried to assert on the AFD, but they seem uninterested in actually addressing my doubts, but rather prefer to obfuscate the issue. I just hope that an admin is going to be able to get to the AFD and address it soon. Thanks for your kind words on my talk page, by the way, JJJ. --Kuzaar^-T-C- 17:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well it just got deleted so I suppose this is where it hits the fan eh? BJK 19:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Japhar isn't content that consensus has been declared and is continuing to policy-lawyer at me on the AFD talk page, so you might say that it continues to be an issue. By the way, please leave any further messages for me on my talk page, I don't want to bug JJJJust any more than necessary. :) --Kuzaar^-T-C- 20:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rush Limbaugh

Thanks, never mind. NawlinWiki 00:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the page. As I'm sure you've noticed, a few extremely ardent Limbaugh fans will tolerate nothing on the article page that paints Limbaugh in less than a flattering light. Some of these same editors are blanking the Palm Beach incident at will, and attempting to game the system on the Talk Page. Ah, well... we've seen this before. Despite what some are claiming, there is no consensus on the Talk page to remove the incident. Just some loud wailing. Eleemosynary 01:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's an RFC on the Talk page now, where people are voting as to whether to keep the airport detention incident in the article. You may want to stop by and vote. Eleemosynary 23:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fagatron

Not only that, but it's already up to more, and... it had already been deleted (see deletion log) when I'd tagged it in its first incarnation, although that was just one line of nonsense. GassyGuy 11:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We may not only have the record for most tags applied, but also most users/bots applying them. What a momentous occasion. I, for one, feel honoured to be a part of it. GassyGuy 11:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The warnings on the guy's talk page cracked me up, too. "Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Fagatron...." Priceless. GassyGuy 11:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!!

I'm Mr.Willison I Just made an user page and I'm so lost can you

help me and about that date of creation how about you check your

history? Mr.Willison.9:23 19 July 2006

Thank you

Thanks for the clarification.... User:HockeyRocksMySocks

points up* Is that okay?

Article copyrights

Hello JJJJust, I have permissions to post this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Heroes_-_Underground_Horror from original source - http://www.qplaze.com/en/n3_age_of_heroes_2_test.html How could I do it?

Gik 14:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.

I really appreciate you fixing the layout on Corner Pocket. It's my first article, and my wiki skills are pretty sub-par.

Re : Articles for Deletion: Alphabetical list of NES Rom Hacks

Done. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 05:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Motorola V180

It reads a lot better now, and I don't think there is any question that the page is now compliant with NPOV and properly sourced. Thank you for taking the time to improve the page :). Fabricationary 01:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

The article you speedied is part of Portal:Poetry, and is created so that when March 2007 rolls around, that article will automatically appear as featured. For example, see Portal:Poetry/Selected article archive/September 2006 Thanks. AdamBiswanger1 04:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, didn't notice. At least it's not a nonsense title anymore AdamBiswanger1

I forgot to mention that I moved it to Portal:Poetry/Selected article archive/March 2007. Best wishes, AdamBiswanger1 04:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Someone (not me) moved a page with my account... Thanks for the revert!Aran heru nar 08:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SSP

Aloha. I warned both of the users. If they continue, I will protect their talk pages. Thanks, Iola k ana•T 15:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wikisource tag

Please check Wikisource first to see if it needs the material before tagging anything for transwiki. The best way the verify what WS has is to check the Author page in the Author namespace. Nearly all authors are linked from ther WP pages. People may use slightly different titles so authors are generaly authorative. Thanks.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 13:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Open Proxies

Hi :). About the OP's: i used Shaun's Proxycheck, (vcn), and it indicated every one was "Not an open Proxy". I was told by an administrator that this is enough to use Inconclusive evidence or Not an open proxy, which I did. But I don't mind if you leave it as Open proxy. Thanks! --D e on555 ^talk_Review 23:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe they all are

Open proxy's. They're are many proxy's i've tested with VCN that have shon up "not an open proxy", when, infact, they were. I use mainly other tools, but admins who block sometimes check with VCN and they're like uhhh it's not a proxy :P. Well yeh, i'll just use my best judgement (and the best tools ;) ). Have a good day.--D e on555 ^talk_Review 03:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thanks so much for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (64/3/3). I will be stepping lightly at first trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! NawlinWiki 11:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC) talk contribs[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, JJJJust, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hurricane Katrina 22:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Just checking how you are doing JJJJust Umm I need help On putting up pics thanks. User:Mr.Willison 6:52 6 sept 2006

CSDing my subpage

Thanks for the help. WilyD 20:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeun Zhey accusation you made to me - don't bite the newbies isn't true!

I think must be accusing the wrong person regarding Yeun Zhey. I don't know what the subject is, never participated in the article, and didn't copyvio anything. Not quite sure why you have picked me to reprimand and lecture about this. Check my contributions, since you obviously have targeted me for this offense.

Rather unfriendly and patronizing of you, as this message to you is only my third edit here but I know enough not to copyvio in really life. I'm not dumb. What about all that stuff about don't bite the newbies? You don't follow that I guess.

Let me know how I can avoid you from now on. BlueRas 12:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the article was created by on at 22:07, 6 September 2006 by user:BlueRas. That was the only edit to the article other than by user:JJJJust who placed the copyvio notice. The material was coppied from chinadaily.com.cn. I will not undelete it. I do not undelete copyvios but any other admin will confirm my statement.Geni 22:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Star of life.svg

Re [1], thanks for removing the incorrect prod — I've {{NowCommonsThis}}ed it. -- Jeandré, 2006-09-18t11:18z

thanks

thanks for that on my artical. Mr.Willison 20:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Melvin

Can you explain why you changed my disamiguation page for John Melvin back to a redirect Graemec2 12:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sexo, amor y otras perversiones

I have a request for you for whenever you become a sysop. To change that page back to its lower case title. You changed it back in August to Title Case but Spanish titles have all lowecare letter, as it can be attested at this film's IMDB site http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0419396/. Cheers --FateClub 22:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:Brain.png

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Brain.png, by Strangerer (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Brain.png is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Brain.png, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AmericanPageant12th.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AmericanPageant12th.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Annie Jacobsen

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Annie Jacobsen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Annie Jacobsen seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Annie Jacobsen, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:V180wplate.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:V180wplate.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 07:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:V180noplate.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:V180noplate.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 07:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WinPureLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WinPureLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AmericanPageant12th.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AmericanPageant12th.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject C-SPAN?

Greetings fellow Wikipedia editor -

I am leaving you this note because I have reason to believe that you are interested in C-SPAN. (I may have made this assumption based on your C-SPAN user box, or perhaps for some other reason.) If this is not an interest of yours, please feel free to read no further and delete this message.

If you are in fact someone who is interested in C-SPAN, then let me put forward an idea that I have been kicking around for a while. What if we started a C-SPAN WikiProject?

The parameters of this (potential) project are up for discussion, but it could include some or all of the following (as well as things that may occur to you that have not occurred to me):

Creation, maintenance, and improvement of articles and lists directly related to C-SPAN and its programming.
Use of C-SPAN programming in citations for various topics
Inclusion of unique and targeted C-SPAN video links for various articles. (Doing this with respect for established guidelines at Wikipedia:External links.) (Example: If you are interested in the submarine USS Wyoming (SSBN-742), then having easy access to the eight hours of programming taped while a C-SPAN crew were guests on that submarine could also be of interest to you.)
Inclusion of (and possible further creation of) templated links such as {{C-SPAN|laurabush}}, that will easily take article readers to a link of all C-SPAN Video Library links for the person about whom the article is about.
What else?

I don't know exactly how far we may want to go, nor in what directions, but I do believe (as I have long noted on my user page) that C-SPAN and Wikipedia are both...

...fantastic vehicles for the free exchange of ideas and information in a non-sound-bite manner, and they both invite the participation of any parties (expert or amateur) who are interested in taking the time to absorb and/or contribute to the ideas and information offered. C-SPAN and Wikipedia go together like peanut butter and jelly, and I want to help give other Wiki users easy access to the great work that C-SPAN has done on a variety of topics.

Now, I should mention that I have never started a WikiProject before, and I do not know the best way to go about it. (Perhaps one of you do?) Let me offer one of my sandbox pages, User:KConWiki/sandbox/Wikiproject C-SPAN?, as a gathering area for comments until such time as we gather enough steam to start our own WikiProject page.

Thanks for reading this far, and I hope that you will give some consideration as to whether this is something we ought to attempt. Please feel free to pass this message on to others you know whom might be interested, and please let me know your thoughts and comments.

KConWiki (talk) 04:18, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: New helper policy

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)}[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi JJJJust,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JJJJust. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JJJJust. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JJJJust. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject on open proxies discussion

Hello, you are receiving this message because you have either contributed to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests in the past six months or are an active editor listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/verified users. I have started a discussion regarding the project's current status at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies#Reboot, you are invited to participate in the discussion. If you are not interested in the project, no action is required on your part; this is a one-time notification and you will not receive any further messages. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC) (on behalf of User:GeneralNotability)[reply]

The West Wing task force

Hi there! If you're receiving this, it's because you like The West Wing—I happen to love the show, and I'm trying to set up a task force for it under Wikipedia:WikiProject Television to improve its coverage on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, please leave your name here—hope to see you there!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]