User talk:JLeonR

Combee[edit]

Combee is a Flying, Bug type Pokemon in Game Freak's Pokemon franchise considered as the IV Generation. Created by Ken Sugimori, Combee first appeared in the video game Pokemon Diamond and Pearl and following squeals, it then made a first appearance in the animated franchise Pokemon Season 10: Diamond and Pearl episode 31 The Grass-type is Always Greener[1], from then Combee made numerous appearances as a background character in the season.

Known as the Tiny Bee Pokemon if a female Cobee reaches level 21 she will evolve into a Vespiqueen, Combee has also been featured a numerous times in the Pokemon Trading Card Game.[2]

Stats[edit]

Combee being a Flying and Bug type Pokemon is effective against: Fighting, Grass and other Bug type Pokemon, however it is very weak to: Flying, Ice, Fire, Rock and Electric Type Pokemon.

Stat	Base Number
Health	30
Attack	30
Defence	42
Sp.Atk	30
Sp.Def	42
Speed	70

Upon Level 1 Combee can learn the following moves when hatched from an egg.

Move	Attack Damage	Move Accuracy
Bug Bite	60	100
Gust	40	100
Struggle Bug	50	100
Sweet Scent	N/A	N/A

References[edit]

1. The Grass-Type is Always Greener Pokemon Official Website Viewed - 14/4/20 https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-episodes/10_31-the-grass-type-is-always-greener/?play=true

2. Combee XY Trading Card Pokemon Viewed - 14/4/20 https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-tcg/pokemon-cards/xy-series/xy7/9/

3. Combee PokeDex Pokemon Database Viewed - 15/4/20 https://pokemondb.net/pokedex/combee

4.Combee #415 Serebii Viewed - 15/4/20 https://www.serebii.net/pokedex-xy/415.shtml

5. Combee Pokemon Official Website Viewed - 15/4/20 https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokedex/combee

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Pokemon.com is a primary source. Good examples of Pokemon (IV Generation) character articles can be found at Lucario or Giratina.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JLeonR/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:JLeonR/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JLeonR! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Garchomp, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JLeonR/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:JLeonR/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]