User talk:JSFruehe

Weebit Nano moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Weebit Nano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is full of external links in the body. Remove and give me a shout when done.

Edits made, let me know if there is anything else

JSFruehe JSFruehe (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JSFruehe: Sorry I never realised you were going to be that quick. I thought it would take a couple of weeks. Can you submit it, and i'll post it. scope_creep^Talk 18:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JSFruehe: I see you have put the technology back, which is really unsuitable in the language it uses. Can you slim it down, or flatten somehow to make it readable. Link it more. Wikipedia is designed for the general reader, not a hardware design engineer. It makes no sense at the moment, and if you can't do it, it will need to come out. scope_creep^Talk 18:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I have to ask you, are you being paid to create the article or are you linked to the company in some way? scope_creep^Talk 18:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like my last comment did not work.

1. I removed the 4 direct links.

2. I had not seen a comment about the technology section. Should I remove this for now, rework it and get it back to you for approval?

3. Yes, I am working for this company. They contacted me because of the work I had done for my old company's wikipedia page. Is there a conflict? Happy to discuss.

JSFruehe JSFruehe (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good on you. Try and rework it a bit, if you can. It looks better on the 2nd read, may be ok. If you can link more it would help. You will be need to make a disclosure per WP:PAID and WP:DISCLOSE, which means puting up a notice on your user page. Thanks for that. scope_creep^Talk 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions at WP:PAID and WP:DISCLOSURE are pretty decent. Please follow them to disclose your coi. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on the technology section in the next 24-hours to make it more readable for the non-semiconductor crowd. I will also make that disclosure, I was not aware of that. I'll add in my old company as I did edits for them in the past.

Thanks for your review

JSFruehe (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration[edit]

Hi @JSFruehe: I took that off your user page. I'll find the right template. scope_creep^Talk 19:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Hi JSFruehe, use the [1] template, fill it in per instructions and put it on your user page. scope_creep^Talk 19:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have updated my user page for both company now and my previous employer.

Thanks for the link, will work on the technology section for you.

JSFruehe (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coby Hanoch moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Coby Hanoch, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I updated with additional citations and resubmitted JS Fruehe JSFruehe (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Coby Hanoch has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Coby Hanoch. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 20:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have consolidated much of the earlier career information. Thanks, John. JSFruehe (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coby Hanoch (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coby Hanoch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coby Hanoch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JSFruehe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JSFruehe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 17:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Coby Hanoch[edit]

Hello, JSFruehe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coby Hanoch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Coby Hanoch[edit]

Hello, JSFruehe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coby Hanoch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]