User talk:JTLoto

Welcome!

Hello, JTLoto, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nininho Vaz Maia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nininho Vaz Maia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nininho Vaz Maia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nininho Vaz Maia

Your draft article has been moved to draft space, where you can work on bringing it up to the required standard for inclusion, then submit for review. Please do not move it yourself. Deb (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb,

I did everything the community asked. I adjusted the text following the same scheme as other artists, inserted links for independent verification, etc. You can check the references' links and confirm all information is legit! I don't understand why you keep deleting a page about a very well know musician in Portugal, with news that confirm everything that it is written in the article!

Can you please tell me exactly what am I doing wrong and where you cannot see the relevance of this page? JTLoto (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has not been deleted. You unwisely moved it straight to article space. If you really think it's suitable for Wikipedia as it stands, all you need to do is submit it for review and wait for the feedback. Deb (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @Deb,

Thank you for your reply. Already submited it. Thank you. JTLoto (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello JTLoto. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JTLoto. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JTLoto|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Praxidicae,

I totally understand what you mean. I am definitely NOT being paid by the artist, and my insistence on this subject has more to do with the proof of concept in me adding information to the Wikipedia. My goal is to provide accurate information about an artist I have come across with, and because it is clearly relevant in the Portuguese music scene, document this notable artist in the Wikipedia, the same way you can find other flamenco artists, such as Rosalia, Paco de Lucia, and others.

Also, that is why I tried to reference every fact in the article, linking to independent news in different publishers that have covered the artist's career and concerts. JTLoto (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then please explain how the images were your own work? In fact, you've argued this on commons. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, no problem.

I contacted the artist press team in order to use to photo and upload it to the Wikipedia article. I did not find the Wiki page for their photographer, but they told me Wikipedia could use the photo without restrictions and free from copywrite infringement. Maybe it was the wrong definition, but I had no way to link to another page. This is a picture which has been shared many times to many publishers (and that is why you can find it in many news articles widespread across the internet). JTLoto (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's...not how copyright or "own work" works. Why should we believe what you say now? Also you've been editing for years with a WP:COI. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A COI? I haven't been posting for years in Wikipedia, I reckon...

Anyway, I am providing facts and real information, I am not making anything up, and it is all supported in news and articles I referenced in the page. Feel free to analyse and see for yourselves. A quick review of the references will show you the information is real and true.

I don't know what else I can do to prove you this. JTLoto (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Nininho.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nininho.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nininho Vaz Maia (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"early career" section is unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nininho Vaz Maia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JTLoto! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nininho Vaz Maia

Hello, JTLoto. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nininho Vaz Maia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nininho Vaz Maia

Hello, JTLoto. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nininho Vaz Maia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]