User talk:Jake-jakubowski/Archive 1

Site of Fort Andross

Page looks great, nice job! Any reason not to just title the page Fort Andross? SEMMENDINGER (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I thought of it, but with all the different names it's had over te years, I considered "Site of" to be better suited. I created a page for "Fort Andross" that links to this one though. Jake-jakubowski (talk) 18:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I actually took your advice and changed the name of the article to just Fort Andross Jake-jakubowski (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hero-poster-the-mayor.jpg

Hi Jake! If you want to keep the poster of the movie on Wikimedia Commons it might be necessary to send a mail to permissions-commonswikimedia.org to prove that you hold the copyright to the image Trade (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

eMail has been sent.... Approved.

2022-10-21 Jake-jakubowski (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Quatchenerlo

I moved your message to the talk page. Drmies (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Jake-jakubowski (talk) 22:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jake-jakubowski. Thank you for your work on Bill Curtsinger. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on the article! Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Thank you very much! Jake-jakubowski (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! Jake-jakubowski (talk) 15:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry Tremain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kerry Tremain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 I completely understand why there is a notability issue with the article, however, I am confused as to why you think there is a UPE/COI issue? I was not paid for this article, nor do I know the subject. JakeJakubowski talk 20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help with new list article

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am in the middle of creating a sandbox page titled List of National Geographic cover stories. I am starting to realize that, when complete, it may be way too long. My question is, would it be recommended to break out the list into decades? Or even by year? If I do it by decade, there will be 120 References, which may also be too much?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

If it is recommended that the list be broken out into decades or years I will place a template at the bottom of each page like this.

I haven't decided on the format of the table yet, I'm leaning towards this. Jake-jakubowski (talk) 19:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would start by decade; 120 references isn't that bad. Primefac (talk) 20:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac Thanks for the reply. Jake Jakubowski (Talk) 20:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of National Geographic cover stories (1959 & 1960s), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wendy K. Ulmer bibliography

Hello, Jake-jakubowski. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wendy K. Ulmer bibliography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Brunswick Falls

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brunswick Falls you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Praseodymium-141 -- Praseodymium-141 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

Please read the guidance at WP:PROD. The prod template to propose non-controversial deletions should only be used on mainspace articles, not articles in draftspace. I have removed the two you placed on drafts. Schazjmd (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok gotcha, thank you. Jake Jakubowski (Talk) 23:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Jake-jakubowski. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – Joe (talk) 10:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jake-jakubowski. Thank you for your work on Antarctic Journal of the United States. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Selected anniversaries/October 1

Hello,

Your entry on October 1st seems to be incomplete, as nothing was boldfaced. As well, please use past tense when adding entries to OTD. I encourage you to reinsert it and continue adding new entries to OTD as it is very much needed! Please see WP:Selected anniversaries#Steps for suggesting new listings to see how to correctly add an entry. Happy editing, Heart ^(talk) 23:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Igor Zotikov

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Igor Zotikov you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SpaceEconomist192 -- SpaceEconomist192 (talk) 12:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Igor Zotikov

The article Igor Zotikov you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Igor Zotikov and Talk:Igor Zotikov/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SpaceEconomist192 -- SpaceEconomist192 (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Frank J. Wood Bridge

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frank J. Wood Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Frank J. Wood Bridge

The article Frank J. Wood Bridge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frank J. Wood Bridge and Talk:Frank J. Wood Bridge/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Frank J. Wood Bridge

The article Frank J. Wood Bridge you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Frank J. Wood Bridge for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Igor Zotikov

The article Igor Zotikov you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Igor Zotikov for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SpaceEconomist192 -- SpaceEconomist192 (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]