User talk:Jakezing

Hi there? Why are you here?--Mikal (talk) 02:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Thanks for cleaning it up. To my surprise, he seems to have got the message (though he didn't like it) and stopped. I thought he was going to be one of the ones who just carries on until blocked. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK I think I fixed it for you. Captain Virtue (talk) 20:27 May 28 2009

Problem

Why are you having a problem with me?Max Mux (talk) 08:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

... you ca;led somebody an idiot for not thinking kosovo should be a country max, that is why--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you telling me these things? I never said that!Max Mux (talk) 15:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"How do you know? Maybe he comes to his senses.Max Mux (talk) 07:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)" That says otherwise--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 17:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've never called him an idiot, so please stop telling lies.Max Mux (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand?Max Mux (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But why?Max Mux (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC) I've asked you a question.Max Mux (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Those articles Max Mux made

What do you mean? Ironholds (talk) 14:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Max Mux

Consider this a warning for you too. Stop hassling and baiting Max Mux ("I find it funnier..." etc.), it's just causing trouble. Find some articles to edit. ╟─Treasury Tag►most serene─╢ 11:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TreasuryTag is correct. You need to stop harassing Max immediately or you will find yourself blocked. Shell ^babelfish 02:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yawns... yah yah i know.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 02:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You loaded the gun yourself

Based on this I'm going to stick in for an indef block. You've been told to stop goading him, and you haven't. An ANI thread will be posted shortly, consider this a notification. Ironholds (talk) 06:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree. ╟─Treasury Tag►Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster─╢ 06:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i DID NOT goad him. I decided ot tell him WHY i don't like him. The way he replied was up to him. I wasn't doing that. Jesus can't yopu people talk to the person before you assume--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Law_{type! snype?} 08:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jakezing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ignore the other one... that was me still being immature. I can be a good editor... but when I go to talk pages... I stop being one ussualy... so... If I am unblocked I think theres a FINAL last chance for me, I no longer edit talk pages and avoid articles max edits. This seems a little fairer since If i avoid talk pages, I don't have much to fight on, and if i avoid max I don't have ot worry about getting into trouble related to him? I like ot edit wikipedia and I want to help... but talk pages ussualy lead me into a fight so; if i'm not allowed ot edit those we only have to really worry about me being a vandal. Please... give me FINAL chace, if i get blocked again after this i'll drop it forever.

Decline reason:

{{subst:This is the fourth time you've been indefinitely blocked with additional blocks in between for the same behavior. There's just nothing left to give you more chances with. Also, there is consensus gathering at ANI for your ban.}} Shell ^babelfish 15:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict with Shell.) I'm sorry but I just don't think it's possible. You have been indefinitely blocked two times before, once as User:Cody6, and received several temporary blocks for incivility and harassment. Even ignoring your block evasion by using this account in the first place, you have had, by my count, a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th chance, then a last chance, and a second last chance when Jayron did not indefinitely block you. And yet, your behavior hasn't gotten better in the slightest. I have no confidence that you would be able to control yourself or would stick to only talk pages, and your article contributions, while positive, are not something unreplaceable. And in any case, avoiding talk pages is not a good thing: we expect contributors to controversial articles like your Kosovo interests to engage in discussion.

Personally, I doubt this block will ever be lifted, you've abused our trust too many times, and you've just said things you thought we wanted to hear before in order to get unblocked. You promised to work on your civility issues but I don't see that you've even done that. At the very least I can guarantee it will not be lifted for at least one year: don't even make another request until then, people are really sick of your behavior right now and it would only make things worse. Mango juice^talk 15:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cody6 is not indef blocked to my knoweldge (although he may have been blocked during the last indef i had for jake). m,ade jakezing because i couldn't log into cody6.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To those coming her from the sockpuppetry case... Block cody6... im not going ot use him to make this worse... hell I don't even know his password (why do you think i made jakezing in the first place)--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A solution to the problem

Ok... I got blocked again.. not the plan but... Sigh... How about this... I'm a good editor until i go to talk pages basically... so.. If i'm unblocked... how about a final deal... I don't edit talk pages: this removes 0ver 90% of my problems (and i;ll avoid anything with max as well) Will this work.. I really don't want ot be blocked... I'm just pathetic... you know?--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've already had a final deal - that was when you were unblocked last time. Note that the ANI thread has revealed unanimous support for this block, which means you are not blocked but rather community banned. As such, a simple unblock request is pointless. Ironholds (talk) 14:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The LAST solution didn't fix the fact i still edited talk pages. This solution DOES stop that from being a factor in the problem. If I can't edit talk pages I'm more or less a good editor (although sometimes I make mistakes on articles when i DO edit them. pLEASE... --Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, it appears that you were never actually linked to the ANI thread about your block. Law_{type! snype?} 14:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it, and I know from all your standpoints (and parts of mine) I don't deserve one... but i WANT ot be a good editor... I'm just not good at doing that when it comes ot talk pages. Please... just one more chance...--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Law, see the post above where I notified him. You've already had your "one more chance". You were unblocked on conditions of good behavior. You misbehaved, and were told that you would be reblocked, which you responded to by 1) "yawning" and not paying attention and 2) continuing the problematic behavior. You were blocked, as we said you would be. You've had your last chance, and I see no evidence to suggest that you're going to change. Unblocking and banning you from talkpages would get rid of 90% of the problem, you say? That implies you'd still be a problem. Blocking you, on the other hand, solves the problem completely. Ironholds (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is still that some 10% problem,... but its the SAME 10% that we ALL have, and im better at controlling myself since i don't use alot of edit summaries when i revert vandalism, which is my other activity besides it. Second... I know im being immature... but last time we didn't really solve the problem because i went back to the SAME articles i edited before. If i don't do that this time and i don't edit talk pages, what problem is there?--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None, but we've no proof you'll stop. Last time you promised to stop misbehaving. You didn't. This time you promise to stop misbehaving and editing certain pages. Why should we believe that you will? Through info from Baseball Bugs we found out you're also User:Cody6, who was indefinite blocked twice for refusing to get a clue. You're asking for a fifth chance when you've squandered four, and we've no reason to believe you're telling the truth. Ironholds (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because... Because... Because I can be, and I have been before, between all my bad edits, all my problems I have proven I can be a good editor. Yes; I have a history of getting a chance then fucking it up. I'm askinf for just one more, one more, to prove myself... please... I just want to be a good editor, that's all. Like I said: I'f im banned a final time after this i'd dfrop the subject entirely... Just please let me prove I can and will be a good editor.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 15:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General consensus seems to be that "because I can be" isn't good enough. Between bad edits you're a good editor? that's true of everyone. Follow mangojuice's advice - go off, come back in a year or so when you can keep a lid on it and you've grown up a bit. Ironholds (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am grown up... and i fugured that. I might not wait a whole year... im a little impatient for that but i WILL wait.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cody6 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 19:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a sockpuppet! I stopped using cody6 because i couldn't find the password! IF you look at logs i mqade by first edit with jakezing while cody6 was not blocked! I am not a ban circumventor! Block cody6 if you want! I can't log onto him anyways!--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damn it gameshowe can't you discuss with me before you start accussing me of breaking other rules! Ban cody6, I don't need the account, I can't even log onto the thing.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Satsuma-samurai-during-boshin-war-period3.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Satsuma-samurai-during-boshin-war-period3.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 19:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, Picture no longer needed--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jakezing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've had... quite a lot of time to think and look back over the last year. A lot of time to think about my actions here. How I kept abusing all your trust, How I kept just doing the same stupid shit over and over.. I'd actually thought about not even asking for a unblock because of that but, i enjoy editing this site when I can, participating in some of the discussions and just helping things spread here. So, I'd like to be unblocked. I know after all the drama of the last few years I'd had I don't deserve a new chance, but I'd like one. I can't guarantee I will always be civil (Nobody can make that sort of promise) but, In general I've just not acted like I have before anywhere. Thats why I feel im ready to try again here.

Decline reason:

Any unblock would be justified by the credibility of your reform. On the positive side, we have only your assurance here. On the negative side, we have nearly all of your previous history, up to the time of your last block in June 2009. (The current block is your second indefinite block). You seem to be under a community ban that was imposed at WP:ANI, so a consensus would have to be obtained at a noticeboard to allow your unblock. I also asked for the opinion of User:Ironholds since his name appears in the talk page above. Neither of us feels that your new career will be any better than your last. Maybe you would consider contributing to another Wikimedia project for a while, such as Commons, to create some kind of a positive record that would justify your unblocking here. EdJohnston (talk) 04:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reviewing admin has asked for their decision to be reviewed at Wikipedia:Ani#Jakezing_requesting_unblock. While you cannot comment there you can follow the discussion. If you have anything you wish to say please post it here - it will be copied to the discussion if relevant. Exxolon (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

march 2012

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jakezing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've spent the last 2 years since my last unblock request; alongside the year before that, thinking everything over. I know you recommended editing other wikimedia projects, but none of them really interest me enough to edit, and at the same time I know there's probably no real way i can convince any of you i'm not going to just go off again like I did the other times my block ended...and My block is valid, i don't deny that; I broke many rules and abused the trust of other editors, multiple times, i understand and accept that it's perfectly acceptable to just leave me blocked til the site shuts down. At the same time I do want to edit again; I don't know where or what, but it's annoying not being able to sometimes, if I see a problem, something like that. I know im pretty much asking you to take me on my word, something you, as said before don't trust, and either way I need a community vote to unban me completely, but I really would like to try again; start over and everything, atleast to have a chance at it again.

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you will need to provide a detailed explanation of how you will avoid the problems which led to your block and a clear explanation of what it is that you wish to edit. You are not going to be unblocked on the basis of this sketchy statement, and the statement below indicates that you don't understand the rules around sockpuppetry. Note that any serious unblock request here will need to be considered at WP:AN or WP:ANI (an admin will copy it across). Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A Personal request no matter how this goes, can I have the sockpuppet thing removed? To the best of my knowledge I never willingly used Jakezing against the rules in relation to Cody6, and this account only exists because I couldn't log into cody6. --Mikal (talk) 03:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]