User talk:James1893
May 2024[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2024 Scottish government crisis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2024 Scottish government crisis was changed by James1893 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955708 on 2024-05-01T22:56:11+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
Hello, I'm Tim O'Doherty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 Scottish government crisis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 23:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm new to editing but I see where I went wrong now. I got referred to this page to take a look because it's supposed to be a neutral site and I saw a lot wrong with it and wanted to try and change it. It's pretty obvious that it's been written by someone with a beef with the Scot Parly. It's playing-up the Humza resignation and making a meal of it. It padded out the Bute House text when you've got a whole other article you could just link to and summarise, which looks to me like it was trying to add weight and gravitas to what is essentially a few events in a short period that led to Humza resigning. The title just doesn't belong to the article. The first no confidence didn't happen because he resigned and the other one was never going to succeed. It's really overblown. I understand why someone might want to cover the events on Wikipedia but this is a shameless attempt to use them to undermine the parly. Has the page got restricted access so that all that crap can be removed and put right? James1893 (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
James1893 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Seriously, fuck you. I'm not even in the same time zone. Sock puppet? I don't even know how to make the same changes he did. I made my bloody own. I barely know what I'm doing, but sure, yeah, label anyone trying to make the same sort of changes to a completely biased article as sockpuppets. That's one way to ensure that Wikipedia remains biased in your favour. James1893 (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We don't tolerate personal attacks like this. If you make one again, you will lose access to your talk page. You note that you aren't in the same time zone. Please give your time zone and the time zone of Andrewjmoran and specifically how you know Andrewjmoran's time zone. Note that off-wiki collaboration is treated as sockpuppetry; see WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 23:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.