User talk:Jan12shamil

Hi, Welcome to my talk page!

Jan12shamil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jan12shamil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Howdy hello

I see that you have made several many accounts, might I ask why? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<<Jan12shamil>> Cause one was disappearing after another

FYI

– Moved to relevant section.

Hi Captain Eek! i created many accounts cause 1 was disappearing after another.

Well you shouldn't need to create any more? Just make sure to remember your login details for this account! CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jan12shamil What do you mean by your accounts "disappearing"? If you simply forgot your login details, then please do make a better note of them this time. On the other hand, if your previous accounts were blocked or banned, please ensure you understand the relevant Wikipedia policies so you don't lose another account. ClaudineChionh (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC). <<Jan12shamil>> When i went in to wikipedia they said Not logged in and when i was trying to sign in again they said name is already taken not knowing it was me[reply]

Nomination of Evelyn B. Pantig for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evelyn B. Pantig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn B. Pantig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

––FormalDude talk 06:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm ClaudineChionh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, J. Todd Coleman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ClaudineChionh (talk) 06:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harold Godwinson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 06:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn B. Pantig, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:13, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andronikos V Palaiologos. Curbon7 (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Evelyn B. Pantig

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Evelyn B. Pantig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Curbon7 (talk) 07:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Jan12shamil, you've been repeatedly placing pages into a state of disrepair, to the point of being indistinguishable from defacement outright. That needs to be addressed if you are to continue editing here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 09:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Curbon7 (talk) 07:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 07:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jan12shamil, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Curbon7 (talk) 09:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]